Goodness me, I thought it was simple enough. Let me explain.MurphyStout wrote:I've read that sentence four times and it still doesn't make any sense to me, I think I need a pepsi!!Martin Milner wrote:If I didn't know that you know Jack and I didn't know that you know that I know Jack I might think you might be using Pepsi as a substitute for something stronger but as we both know and both know that each other know that Jack is teetotal such a misunderstanding would never arise. Clearly.susnfx wrote: Jack typing after one too many Pepsi's.
Jack is teetotal. Susan knows Jack. Martin knows Jack. While Susan and Martin have not met in person, they know each other both through reputation and through the medium of The Chiff, and a certain rapport has developed in which either party may use occasional euphemisms to avoid shocking the younger, tenderer, and generally more easily shockable members of the aforementioned online poststructural community. Susan knows Jack is teetotal. Martin knows Jack is teetotal. Susan knows Martin knows Jack. Martin knows Susan knows Jack. Susan knows Martin knows Jack is teetotal. Martin knows Susan knows Jack is teetotal. Under the aforestated consideration of shared knowledge, the use of the word Pepsi, which under other conditions might be employed as a euphemism for an alcoholic beverage, cannot be mistaken by either of the parties to mean anything other that what it says on the tin, Pepsi. Or Maybe Coca Cola. But probably Pepsi.
Ah, by ect you meant etc. Now I see.
The fiddler's joy is that he doesn't need to know the key before selecting which instrument to play on. I'll play this on my (drum roll) fiddle! All the known notes available, plus an infinite number of possible variants (and don't my longsuffering neighbours know that!).