From timber to timbre

The Chiff & Fipple Irish Flute on-line community. Sideblown for your protection.
User avatar
apossibleworld
Posts: 144
Joined: Tue Nov 22, 2011 11:34 pm
antispam: No
Please enter the next number in sequence: 10
Location: New York

From timber to timbre

Post by apossibleworld »

I'm interested in how much different aspects of the flute play out in the final sound. For instance, take the color of the tone -- what makes one flute bright sounding and another dark? Is it the shape of the embouchure, the undercutting, the size and/or cut of toneholes relative to bore dimensions? How much is the player, and in that case is it about the way you focus your breath or other factors?

Of course the obvious answer is: everything plays a part. But which features would you investigate and how?

A corollary: the sound I would like to achieve right now is dark, bubbly, and pure, which is not the most common tone, but some great players seem to have it. The opposite of bright and breathy. Almost like a sine wave, or like a more powerful baroque sound. So anybody's thoughts on that as it relates to flutes and tone production would be interesting.

A huge topic, I know :)
User avatar
Kirk B
Posts: 731
Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 6:33 am
antispam: No
Please enter the next number in sequence: 12
Location: Pittsburgh, PA US

Re: From timber to timbre

Post by Kirk B »

This has sort of been discussed before. Here's a good thread to check out.

viewtopic.php?f=2&t=71193&p=926435

Cheers,

Kirk
User avatar
apossibleworld
Posts: 144
Joined: Tue Nov 22, 2011 11:34 pm
antispam: No
Please enter the next number in sequence: 10
Location: New York

Re: From timber to timbre

Post by apossibleworld »

Thanks for the link. That thread just has a lot of people saying "It's all in the player," and one builder saying, "the cuts of the holes have a lot to do with it." What I'd like to know is more specifically, what are the actual variables, and how do they work. For instance, take three major embouchure cuts, round, oval, and mostly squared -- do those correspond with tendencies toward particular timbres? And what, specifically, does undercutting of the toneholes do? Is that only for tuning, or does it make changes to the timbre too? Hopefully some builders and restorers can chime in.

Or if it really is all with the player, what is it that the player does to effect these differences. I know it's hard to put into words very slight changes of the muscles in your lips, ha!, but maybe we can try. I think it would interesting to really investigate this, instead of just making broad generalizations.
User avatar
paddler
Posts: 755
Joined: Sat Nov 03, 2007 7:19 pm
antispam: No
Please enter the next number in sequence: 8
Location: Hood River, Oregon, USA
Contact:

Re: From timber to timbre

Post by paddler »

I came across an interesting discussion on Simon Polak's website. Simon is a maker of baroque flutes. I've added two URLs below to pages where he talks a bit about the influence of harmonics on how a flute sounds to an audience vs to the player. I thought his observations on the role of feedback to the player in the second page were interesting. Specifically, he makes the point that something that sounds or even just feels different to the player will change how the player plays the music and hence will have a major impact on the audience, even if the first order effect is only detectable by the player and not by the audience.

http://www.earlyflute.com/earlyflutenew ... rying.html
http://www.earlyflute.com/earlyflutenew ... woods.html

I hope this is at least tangentially related to your question about timbre.
User avatar
Kirk B
Posts: 731
Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 6:33 am
antispam: No
Please enter the next number in sequence: 12
Location: Pittsburgh, PA US

Re: From timber to timbre

Post by Kirk B »

apossibleworld wrote:Thanks for the link. That thread just has a lot of people saying "It's all in the player," and one builder saying, "the cuts of the holes have a lot to do with it." What I'd like to know is more specifically, what are the actual variables, and how do they work. For instance, take three major embouchure cuts, round, oval, and mostly squared -- do those correspond with tendencies toward particular timbres? And what, specifically, does undercutting of the toneholes do? Is that only for tuning, or does it make changes to the timbre too? Hopefully some builders and restorers can chime in.

Or if it really is all with the player, what is it that the player does to effect these differences. I know it's hard to put into words very slight changes of the muscles in your lips, ha!, but maybe we can try. I think it would interesting to really investigate this, instead of just making broad generalizations.
I agree that the thread I linked to isn't the most comprehensive thread on the topic but one thing that did come up in there was bore shape. That combined with a lot of other things I've read here lead me to believe that bore shape has the greatest impact on tone.

Cheers,

Kirk
User avatar
Rob Sharer
Posts: 1682
Joined: Tue Jul 18, 2006 7:32 am
Please enter the next number in sequence: 1
Location: Either NC, Co. Clare, or Freiburg i.B., depending...

Re: From timber to timbre

Post by Rob Sharer »

Tone is really subjective, expect arguments.

A great way to research this topic would be to play loads of different flutes and form your own opinion, rather than mining opinions from the likes of us who may, after all, not know what we're talking about.




Rob
User avatar
I.D.10-t
Posts: 7660
Joined: Wed Dec 17, 2003 9:57 am
antispam: No
Location: Minneapolis, MN, USA, Earth

Re: From timber to timbre

Post by I.D.10-t »

Then there is the whole thing about what makers are use to working in and if they want to work in it.
"Be not deceived by the sweet words of proverbial philosophy. Sugar of lead is a poison."
User avatar
Denny
Posts: 24005
Joined: Mon Nov 17, 2003 11:29 am
antispam: No
Location: N of Seattle

Re: From timber to timbre

Post by Denny »

Rob Sharer wrote:the likes of us who may, after all, not know what we're talking about.
yo! whaddaya tryin' to do here?

it's a forum, we talk :really:
Picture a bright blue ball just spinning, spinning free
It's dizzying, the possibilities. Ashes, Ashes all fall down.
User avatar
Denny
Posts: 24005
Joined: Mon Nov 17, 2003 11:29 am
antispam: No
Location: N of Seattle

Re: From timber to timbre

Post by Denny »

Kirk B wrote:lead me to believe that bore shape has the greatest impact on tone.
ah, after the player? :poke:

...and maybe the embouchure, eh?
Picture a bright blue ball just spinning, spinning free
It's dizzying, the possibilities. Ashes, Ashes all fall down.
User avatar
Rob Sharer
Posts: 1682
Joined: Tue Jul 18, 2006 7:32 am
Please enter the next number in sequence: 1
Location: Either NC, Co. Clare, or Freiburg i.B., depending...

Re: From timber to timbre

Post by Rob Sharer »

Denny wrote:
Rob Sharer wrote:the likes of us who may, after all, not know what we're talking about.
yo! whaddaya tryin' to do here?

it's a forum, we talk :really:
Well, what I really feel is that you mostly sound like yourself on whatever flute you play.

In line in front of whatever contribution the material makes, assuming the flute isn't made of some sort of pasta product, are so many different inputs to tone production that material can seem, well, rather immaterial. On two identical flutes (as if that existed) of differing materials, a really together player might be able to tell them apart; a discerning listener in the room might do the same. Then again, maybe not.

I take as an example my little boxwood Olwell. It's all wood in the bore, no slide, small holes, and not surprisingly I sound just like me on it. Give me one in blackwood and bedam if I don't sound the same. In neither case could we "unmake" the flute and hand the same wood to a different maker to test whether the holes were responsible, and that's not the only scientific breakdown in these conversations. Most folks don't even bother shutting their eyes when comparing flutes.

Guitar players crap on all the time about this wood and that, forgetting how variable a commodity is wood. Will we do the same? What sounds better, a flute made from tight, ceramic-y blackwood, or one made from a crummy piece of cocus? The cocus one, obviously, because it costs more. And neither one sounds worth a damn if you embouchure sucks.


Rob
User avatar
Kirk B
Posts: 731
Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 6:33 am
antispam: No
Please enter the next number in sequence: 12
Location: Pittsburgh, PA US

Re: From timber to timbre

Post by Kirk B »

Denny wrote:
Kirk B wrote:lead me to believe that bore shape has the greatest impact on tone.
ah, after the player? :poke:

...and maybe the embouchure, eh?
Well, yeah but we're talking about the flute design so I was taking the player out of the equation. I'd think bore shape has more to do with tone & harmonics than embouchure cut though from what I've read. But hell, I don't know what the facts are and even if I did I wouldn't attempt to confuse the issue with them. :-? :)

Cheers,

Kirk
User avatar
Denny
Posts: 24005
Joined: Mon Nov 17, 2003 11:29 am
antispam: No
Location: N of Seattle

Re: From timber to timbre

Post by Denny »

Rob Sharer wrote:
Denny wrote:
Rob Sharer wrote:the likes of us who may, after all, not know what we're talking about.
yo! whaddaya tryin' to do here?

it's a forum, we talk :really:
Well, what I really feel is that you mostly sound like yourself on whatever flute you play.
so, ah, ya don't do impersonations, eh?
Picture a bright blue ball just spinning, spinning free
It's dizzying, the possibilities. Ashes, Ashes all fall down.
User avatar
Doug_Tipple
Posts: 3829
Joined: Wed Mar 31, 2004 8:49 pm
antispam: No
Please enter the next number in sequence: 10
Location: Indianapolis, Indiana
Contact:

Re: From timber to timbre

Post by Doug_Tipple »

This is complicated. There are no quick and definitive answers to be given. If I talk or write too long about the subject, you will soon get the impression that I don't know what I am talking about, and we wouldn't want that to happen, now, would we? I'm having a hard time trying to imagine a dark, bubbly, and pure tone.
User avatar
Rob Sharer
Posts: 1682
Joined: Tue Jul 18, 2006 7:32 am
Please enter the next number in sequence: 1
Location: Either NC, Co. Clare, or Freiburg i.B., depending...

Re: From timber to timbre

Post by Rob Sharer »

Doug_Tipple wrote:I'm having a hard time trying to imagine a dark, bubbly, and pure tone.

Exactly....totally subjective. Besides, flutes don't sound bubbly; players and embouchures do.



Rob
User avatar
apossibleworld
Posts: 144
Joined: Tue Nov 22, 2011 11:34 pm
antispam: No
Please enter the next number in sequence: 10
Location: New York

Re: From timber to timbre

Post by apossibleworld »

There are plenty of aspects that are subjective, of course. If you read my original post carefully you'll see that I'm asking really specifically about what the effect is of certain concrete features. Let's not bring in the discussion of materials though, too open-ended. I'd love to know if anybody actually knows some of the acoustical science of why a certain shape embouchure cut can have whatever effect it has. Or, what's actually going on with the air inside the tube of the flute.

And then when it comes down to the player, I'd like to know what's going on that a player does, that pushes the sound one way or another. Please, no more responses saying "It's all subjective, so your topic is pointless". If you feel that way, then there's nothing for you to add here!
Last edited by apossibleworld on Wed Dec 07, 2011 9:09 am, edited 1 time in total.
Post Reply