May 8, 2005 -- A tape secretly recorded for the FBI by Sen. Ted Kennedy's brother-in-law has Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton's fund-raiser admitting that a Hollywood gala may have cost way more than her filings said, it was reported yesterday.
Clinton fund-raiser David Rosen told Kennedy in-law Ray Reggie over dinner that a donor is claiming "he spent $2 million on an event that raised $1.4. . . . He may have," The Times-Picayune of New Orleans reported.
Reggie — whose sister Victoria married Kennedy in 1992 — wore an FBI wire and taped what prosecutors call an "incriminating" chat with Rosen over dinner in Chicago in 2000.
Rest:
http://nypost.com/news/nationalnews/43693.htm
...............
Raise your hand if you're surprised.
FUND-RAISER 'FLUBBED' HILLARY DATA
FUND-RAISER 'FLUBBED' HILLARY DATA
IRTradRU?
-
The Weekenders
- Posts: 10300
- Joined: Tue Mar 12, 2002 6:00 pm
- Please enter the next number in sequence: 1
- Location: SF East Bay Area
-
s1m0n
- Posts: 10069
- Joined: Wed Oct 06, 2004 12:17 am
- antispam: No
- Please enter the next number in sequence: 10
- Location: The Inside Passage
Yeah. This is *clearly* of far more import than an illegal war and six figures of casualties.The Weekenders wrote:Where's the outrage?
And now there was no doubt that the trees were really moving - moving in and out through one another as if in a complicated country dance. ('And I suppose,' thought Lucy, 'when trees dance, it must be a very, very country dance indeed.')
C.S. Lewis
C.S. Lewis
Google "Peter Paul", clinton, CNN and see what you don't see.Walden wrote:I bet the government-controlled CNN and junk don't pick up on this... yeah yeah yeah heheheh.. heheheheh... Americans in an iron curtain of ignorance... yeah yeah...
Then google "Peter Paul", clinton and see what the sources are.
The ones that aren't there are the most notable.
IRTradRU?
-
Walden
- Chiffmaster General
- Posts: 11030
- Joined: Thu May 09, 2002 6:00 pm
- antispam: No
- Location: Coal mining country in the Eastern Oklahoma hills.
- Contact:
Alrighty.IRTradRU? wrote:Google "Peter Paul", clinton, CNN and see what you don't see.Walden wrote:I bet the government-controlled CNN and junk don't pick up on this... yeah yeah yeah heheheh.. heheheheh... Americans in an iron curtain of ignorance... yeah yeah...
Then google "Peter Paul", clinton and see what the sources are.
The ones that aren't there are the most notable.
Reasonable person
Walden
Walden
-
OnTheMoor
- Posts: 1409
- Joined: Thu Jan 29, 2004 10:40 pm
- Please enter the next number in sequence: 1
- Location: Ottawa, Canada
Funny, the same search on FOXNews doesn't turn up much either. The vast left-wing conspiracy grows. :roll:
Last edited by OnTheMoor on Mon May 09, 2005 2:58 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
jGilder
- Posts: 3452
- Joined: Thu Dec 16, 2004 11:25 pm
- Please enter the next number in sequence: 1
- Location: San Francisco
- Contact:
OnTheMoor wrote:Funny, the same search on FOXNews doesn't turn up much either. The vast left-wing conspiracy grows.
Deborah Orin, GOP shrill
No need to search Fox News -- the NYPOST is a Rupert Murdoch (FOX News) mouthpiece, and Orin is hardly an ojective journalist. She was shamelessly partisan in trashing Clinton during impeachment, and it's no surprise to find her doing all she can to discredit Hillary. Deborah Orin is basically a GOP shill.
It cracks me up how Hillary has all you guys so terrified.
-
Wanderer
- Posts: 4461
- Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2004 10:49 pm
- antispam: No
- Please enter the next number in sequence: 8
- Tell us something.: I've like been here forever ;)
But I guess you gotta filter out the spambots.
100 characters? Geeze. - Location: Tyler, TX
- Contact:
I'm puzzled.jGilder wrote:OnTheMoor wrote:Funny, the same search on FOXNews doesn't turn up much either. The vast left-wing conspiracy grows.
Deborah Orin, GOP shrill
No need to search Fox News -- the NYPOST is a Rupert Murdoch (FOX News) mouthpiece, and Orin is hardly an ojective journalist. She was shamelessly partisan in trashing Clinton during impeachment, and it's no surprise to find her doing all she can to discredit Hillary. Deborah Orin is basically a GOP shill.
It cracks me up how Hillary has all you guys so terrified.
Whether Deborah Orin is partisan or not, does that actually change the facts? How different is this from when an obviously partisan source says something about Bush and you posting it here and then defending it? I notice that you only trash the journalist and source, and don't really speak to the facts here.
I'm not taking sides politically here. I'm just honestly curious, as a 3rd party observer, how you reconcile these positions. Because, honestly, it really just looks like a matter of "I'll say anything to make your guy look bad, and spin anything said that makes my guy look bad." It makes me less inclined to give your points credibility, and instead tends to make me say "Oh, it's that Bush-hating guy again..yada yada" and gloss over your posts.
Of course, that could just be me. I do the same for any obvious propaganda-looking source, be they democrat or republican, so I'm not just picking on you because i'm a Republican or something (which I'm not).
-
jGilder
- Posts: 3452
- Joined: Thu Dec 16, 2004 11:25 pm
- Please enter the next number in sequence: 1
- Location: San Francisco
- Contact:
It doesn't change the facts -- no. But my post was in response to this:Wanderer wrote: I'm puzzled.
Whether Deborah Orin is partisan or not, does that actually change the facts? How different is this from when an obviously partisan source says something about Bush and you posting it here and then defending it? I notice that you only trash the journalist and source, and don't really speak to the facts here.
He says that he couldn't find the story with a Fox News search thereby suggesting it isn't a right-wing attack piece. He suggests a "vast left-wing conspiracy" mocking Hillary's claim about the right-wing conspiracy. I was pointing out that his search of Fox News meant nothing since the NYPOST is basically a mouthpiece for Fox News owner, Rupert Murdoch, (Who also owns the NYPOST). Like Rupert Murdoch, Deborah Orin is seriously biased and it does bring the validity of the story into question. I certainly wouldn't trust her or Rupart to present the truth. Personally I will look for corroboration from other sources before I'm convinced. But I don't have much at stake in this case one way or the other -- I was just helping the lads to keep it all in perspective.OnTheMoor wrote wrote:Funny, the same search on FOXNews doesn't turn up much either. The vast left-wing conspiracy grows.