A renewable, carbon-neutral fuel source from ... iron?

Socializing and general posts on wide-ranging topics. Remember, it's Poststructural!
User avatar
Nanohedron
Moderatorer
Posts: 38212
Joined: Wed Dec 18, 2002 6:00 pm
antispam: No
Please enter the next number in sequence: 8
Tell us something.: Been a fluter, citternist, and uilleann piper; committed now to the way of the harp.

Oh, yeah: also a mod here, not a spammer. A matter of opinion, perhaps.
Location: Lefse country

A renewable, carbon-neutral fuel source from ... iron?

Post by Nanohedron »

"If you take music out of this world, you will have nothing but a ball of fire." - Tribal musician
User avatar
chas
Posts: 7697
Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2001 6:00 pm
antispam: No
Please enter the next number in sequence: 10
Location: East Coast US

Re: A renewable, carbon-neutral fuel source from ... iron?

Post by chas »

I'm not sure what the advantage of this is over hydrogen. I'd been thinking it'd work with most metals (believe it or not, aluminum dust is quite inflammable), but there's just so much iron out there, there's a huge advantage for iron over just about any other metal.
Charlie
Whorfin Woods
"Our work puts heavy metal where it belongs -- as a music genre and not a pollutant in drinking water." -- Prof Ali Miserez.
User avatar
Nanohedron
Moderatorer
Posts: 38212
Joined: Wed Dec 18, 2002 6:00 pm
antispam: No
Please enter the next number in sequence: 8
Tell us something.: Been a fluter, citternist, and uilleann piper; committed now to the way of the harp.

Oh, yeah: also a mod here, not a spammer. A matter of opinion, perhaps.
Location: Lefse country

Re: A renewable, carbon-neutral fuel source from ... iron?

Post by Nanohedron »

chas wrote:... but there's just so much iron out there, there's a huge advantage for iron over just about any other metal.
I don't know how other metals would measure up to iron in this, but what struck me is how the spent fuel, iron oxide (rust, basically), can be converted back into burnable iron. Maybe the cost of doing that outweighs the advantages now, but the suggestion of a more or less closed loop is most intriguing.
"If you take music out of this world, you will have nothing but a ball of fire." - Tribal musician
PB+J
Posts: 1306
Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2018 5:40 am
antispam: No
Please enter the next number in sequence: 8
Tell us something.: I'm a historian and the author of "The Beat Cop:Chicago's Chief O'Neill and the Creation of Irish Music," published by the University of Chicago in 2022. I live in Arlington VA and play the flute sincerely but not well

Re: A renewable, carbon-neutral fuel source from ... iron?

Post by PB+J »

How are you supposed to produce iron powder? the article mentions "grinding iron" and it looks like it was ground very fine. That has to be a fairly energy intensive process. Also how pure does the iron have to be?
User avatar
Mr.Gumby
Posts: 6606
Joined: Mon Jun 07, 2010 11:31 am
antispam: No
Please enter the next number in sequence: 8
Location: the Back of Beyond

Re: A renewable, carbon-neutral fuel source from ... iron?

Post by Mr.Gumby »

There are a fair few articles about this, mostly in Dutch though. Here are two : from De ingenieur (the engineer), the video in that may be of use, and from Eindhoven University

You'll have t oget your own translations though.
My brain hurts

Image
bigsciota
Posts: 519
Joined: Fri Jun 14, 2013 7:15 pm
antispam: No
Please enter the next number in sequence: 8

Re: A renewable, carbon-neutral fuel source from ... iron?

Post by bigsciota »

Mr.Gumby wrote:There are a fair few articles about this, mostly in Dutch though. Here are two : from De ingenieur (the engineer), the video in that may be of use, and from Eindhoven University

You'll have t oget your own translations though.
My year and a half of learning Dutch is finally paying off!
User avatar
Nanohedron
Moderatorer
Posts: 38212
Joined: Wed Dec 18, 2002 6:00 pm
antispam: No
Please enter the next number in sequence: 8
Tell us something.: Been a fluter, citternist, and uilleann piper; committed now to the way of the harp.

Oh, yeah: also a mod here, not a spammer. A matter of opinion, perhaps.
Location: Lefse country

Re: A renewable, carbon-neutral fuel source from ... iron?

Post by Nanohedron »

PB+J wrote:How are you supposed to produce iron powder? the article mentions "grinding iron" and it looks like it was ground very fine. That has to be a fairly energy intensive process.
I would count that end of it as a one-time investment. If you could burn iron as a way to power the grinding of iron, then any energy expenditure is more or less self-contained, and eminently sustainable.
PB+J wrote:Also how pure does the iron have to be?
No idea. I would imagine the purer, the better.
"If you take music out of this world, you will have nothing but a ball of fire." - Tribal musician
User avatar
chas
Posts: 7697
Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2001 6:00 pm
antispam: No
Please enter the next number in sequence: 10
Location: East Coast US

Re: A renewable, carbon-neutral fuel source from ... iron?

Post by chas »

PB+J wrote:How are you supposed to produce iron powder? the article mentions "grinding iron" and it looks like it was ground very fine. That has to be a fairly energy intensive process. Also how pure does the iron have to be?
I would assume there's a sweet spot regarding the size of the particles. As we all know, iron oxidized very readily, so if the particles are too small, they'll be entirely or mostly oxidized. If they're too big, they'll burn too slowly for a self-sustaining process. Just a WAG, I'd think some fraction of a mm -- maybe 10-200 microns, but the size would need to be pretty uniform for the process to be efficient. As for purity, it would be insensitive to lots of impurities, but too much oxide will mean not much energy, and too much of one of the stainless-passivating metals (e. g., Ni or Cr) would probably kill the reaction.

I had misinterpreted how the Eindhoeven group were pitching this. They're basically considering it a way to store non-constant power sources such as wind or solar, for which it would work well. I still haven't been able to find a comparison of this process to hydrogen, which is much simpler but is difficult to store.
Charlie
Whorfin Woods
"Our work puts heavy metal where it belongs -- as a music genre and not a pollutant in drinking water." -- Prof Ali Miserez.
User avatar
Mr.Gumby
Posts: 6606
Joined: Mon Jun 07, 2010 11:31 am
antispam: No
Please enter the next number in sequence: 8
Location: the Back of Beyond

Re: A renewable, carbon-neutral fuel source from ... iron?

Post by Mr.Gumby »

chas wrote:
I would assume there's a sweet spot regarding the size of the particles. As we all know, iron oxidized very readily, so if the particles are too small, they'll be entirely or mostly oxidized. If they're too big, they'll burn too slowly for a self-sustaining process. Just a WAG, I'd think some fraction of a mm -- maybe 10-200 microns, but the size would need to be pretty uniform for the process to be efficient. As for purity, it would be insensitive to lots of impurities, but too much oxide will mean not much energy, and too much of one of the stainless-passivating metals (e. g., Ni or Cr) would probably kill the reaction.

.
The article I linked to above says something about that (I just noticed I made a mistake with the links, linking to the same article twice):

We kijken bijvoorbeeld naar de grootte en de vorm van de ijzerkorrels. Zijn die groter, dan branden ze langer in de installatie. En ronde deeltjes verbranden mooier, maar laten zich weer lastiger vervoeren door de buizen
Which translates roughly as For example we look at the size and shape of the grains of iron. When the yare larger, they burn longer in the installation. Round grains burn nicer but are harder to transport through pipes.
My brain hurts

Image
david_h
Posts: 1735
Joined: Mon Aug 13, 2007 2:04 am
Please enter the next number in sequence: 1
Location: Mercia

Re: A renewable, carbon-neutral fuel source from ... iron?

Post by david_h »

chas wrote:I would assume there's a sweet spot regarding the size of the particles.
I guess the quantity of nitrogen oxides created and needing to be removed from the exhaust could be a factor in this.
PB+J
Posts: 1306
Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2018 5:40 am
antispam: No
Please enter the next number in sequence: 8
Tell us something.: I'm a historian and the author of "The Beat Cop:Chicago's Chief O'Neill and the Creation of Irish Music," published by the University of Chicago in 2022. I live in Arlington VA and play the flute sincerely but not well

Re: A renewable, carbon-neutral fuel source from ... iron?

Post by PB+J »

It makes sense I guess to think of it as a way to "store" energy gained in solar/wind etc. A solar plant could grind iron and then burn it as needed. But "grinding iron to uniform particles" doesn't seem like a very efficient process and as chas mentioned you'd have to keep the particles from oxidizing.

I'm thinking using excess solar capacity to produce hydrogen would make more sense?

I've ling thought that we'd have been better off if Edison had won out over tesla and we had individual home generators rather than regionally distributed AC. Nearly every device in the house has to transform AC to DC--what are the efficiency losses?

It' not hard to imagine either every house having a generator, just as every house has a furnace, or maybe generating stations on every block serving x number of houses
User avatar
chas
Posts: 7697
Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2001 6:00 pm
antispam: No
Please enter the next number in sequence: 10
Location: East Coast US

Re: A renewable, carbon-neutral fuel source from ... iron?

Post by chas »

PB+J wrote:It makes sense I guess to think of it as a way to "store" energy gained in solar/wind etc. A solar plant could grind iron and then burn it as needed. But "grinding iron to uniform particles" doesn't seem like a very efficient process and as chas mentioned you'd have to keep the particles from oxidizing.

I'm thinking using excess solar capacity to produce hydrogen would make more sense?

I've ling thought that we'd have been better off if Edison had won out over tesla and we had individual home generators rather than regionally distributed AC. Nearly every device in the house has to transform AC to DC--what are the efficiency losses?

It' not hard to imagine either every house having a generator, just as every house has a furnace, or maybe generating stations on every block serving x number of houses
The thing about generating power is that the efficiency goes up with scale. A diesel or kerosene generator for a home is nowhere near as efficient as a steam turbine in a power plant. I used to know how much was lost in transmission, but can't call it up at the moment.

The big thing between Edison and Tesla was AC vs DC. And if solar farms start going up in deserts, that will be transmitted via DC and Edison will be happy.
Charlie
Whorfin Woods
"Our work puts heavy metal where it belongs -- as a music genre and not a pollutant in drinking water." -- Prof Ali Miserez.
User avatar
Nanohedron
Moderatorer
Posts: 38212
Joined: Wed Dec 18, 2002 6:00 pm
antispam: No
Please enter the next number in sequence: 8
Tell us something.: Been a fluter, citternist, and uilleann piper; committed now to the way of the harp.

Oh, yeah: also a mod here, not a spammer. A matter of opinion, perhaps.
Location: Lefse country

Re: A renewable, carbon-neutral fuel source from ... iron?

Post by Nanohedron »

PB+J wrote:... you'd have to keep the particles from oxidizing.
Considering that oxidized iron can be converted back to metallic (I don't know if that is the right word) iron, that seems, at least on paper, to be not so much of a problem. The whole point of burning iron is that when it's burnt, what's left is oxide, but nothing's lost since you can recycle it back to its former state. My guess is that so long as the system's up and running, natural oxidization is going to take more time than can catch up with the cycle of burning/regeneration. I should think that while some oxidization in storage may be inevitable and present a comparative loss of BTUs, that might be weighed negligible enough for the system to be able to pay for itself.

How's the cold fusion Holy Grail going, lately?
"If you take music out of this world, you will have nothing but a ball of fire." - Tribal musician
david_h
Posts: 1735
Joined: Mon Aug 13, 2007 2:04 am
Please enter the next number in sequence: 1
Location: Mercia

Re: A renewable, carbon-neutral fuel source from ... iron?

Post by david_h »

Nanohedron wrote:I should think that while some oxidization in storage may be inevitable
Store it dry away from oxygen? Nitrogen or CO2 should be inexpensive.
User avatar
Nanohedron
Moderatorer
Posts: 38212
Joined: Wed Dec 18, 2002 6:00 pm
antispam: No
Please enter the next number in sequence: 8
Tell us something.: Been a fluter, citternist, and uilleann piper; committed now to the way of the harp.

Oh, yeah: also a mod here, not a spammer. A matter of opinion, perhaps.
Location: Lefse country

Re: A renewable, carbon-neutral fuel source from ... iron?

Post by Nanohedron »

david_h wrote:
Nanohedron wrote:I should think that while some oxidization in storage may be inevitable
Store it dry away from oxygen? Nitrogen or CO2 should be inexpensive.
That sounds possible.
"If you take music out of this world, you will have nothing but a ball of fire." - Tribal musician
Post Reply