dwest wrote:jim stone wrote:Taught university for many years. The chief problem for graduating seniors is functional illiteracy.
A significant minority cannot write a grammatical English sentence. They are graduated anyway
cause the universities need the tuition. Guess what one of the illiterates' favorite majors is?
A teacher-competency test was given the graduating seniors in Education at a local university. All
failed. The test was published on the front page of the Times Picayune. Multiple choice
questions about what the above paragraph had said. Students couldn't read.
Once they are hired as teachers the unions protect them.
Teacher union states
, there are none in the south
, have a higher rate of firings than non-union states.
Your first claim is inaccurate (and I don't see the relevance of your second) .
I don't know about the whole south (a very quick check finds teachers unions
in Mississippi and Georgia) but teachers where I worked
are unionized. For example, after the graduating seniors in education in New Orleans all failed
a teacher competency test, it was realized that many teachers in Louisiana schools
are probably illiterate (coming from the same institutions). So there was a major move
to have teacher competency tests given to all teachers, which the Louisiana union successfully
resisted--as unions have done successfully elsewhere.
The point is that large numbers of graduating seniors from universities in our country are illiterate.
They often go into education, one of the least demanding majors. So
many teachers are illiterate or marginally literate. Once they are hired, the measures
that would get them out of there are widely resisted successfully by unions.
Just to be clear, the unions protect illiterate teachers from being fired for illiteracy
by fighting the testing that would find them. This is consistent with more teachers being
fired in union states than elsewhere, if that's the case. That may not have much to
do with either literacy or unions.