Socializing and general posts on wide-ranging topics. Remember, it's Poststructural!
-
Jayhawk
- Posts: 3921
- Joined: Tue Oct 15, 2002 6:00 pm
- antispam: No
- Please enter the next number in sequence: 8
- Tell us something.: Well, just trying to update my avatar after a decade. Hope this counts! Ok, so apparently I must babble on longer.
- Location: Lawrence, KS
-
Contact:
Post
by Jayhawk »
tin-titan wrote:The loch ness monster is nothing more than a fiberglass torpedo shape object with a small electric motor hooked to it.
No I'm not!
And were did the other 2 Loch Ness Monsters come from? I thought there were only 5 of us originally (and I'm the only real one, anway).
Nessie
-
Jayhawk
- Posts: 3921
- Joined: Tue Oct 15, 2002 6:00 pm
- antispam: No
- Please enter the next number in sequence: 8
- Tell us something.: Well, just trying to update my avatar after a decade. Hope this counts! Ok, so apparently I must babble on longer.
- Location: Lawrence, KS
-
Contact:
Post
by Jayhawk »
dwest wrote:Nessie was a sturgeon.
Ye know too much, ye know too much...
Nessie
-
Denny
- Posts: 24005
- Joined: Mon Nov 17, 2003 11:29 am
- antispam: No
- Location: N of Seattle
Post
by Denny »
jsluder wrote:Or an ugly duckling.
who you callin' ugly?
Picture a bright blue ball just spinning, spinning free
It's dizzying, the possibilities. Ashes, Ashes all fall down.
-
mutepointe
- Posts: 8151
- Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2006 10:16 pm
- Please enter the next number in sequence: 1
- Location: kanawha county, west virginia
-
Contact:
Post
by mutepointe »
The Loch Ness Monster is a Plesiosaur caught in a chrono-synclastic infundibulum. That's why folks can't find it.
Rose tint my world. Keep me safe from my trouble and pain.
白飞梦
-
dwest
- Posts: 7113
- Joined: Tue Aug 07, 2007 11:13 am
Post
by dwest »
mutepointe wrote:chrono-synclastic infundibulum
You Kazak! That's not true!
-
jsluder
- Posts: 6231
- Joined: Fri Jan 10, 2003 6:00 pm
- antispam: No
- Location: South of Seattle
Post
by jsluder »
Denny wrote:jsluder wrote:Or an ugly duckling.
who you callin' ugly?
My words were intended in the "takes one to know one" sense, ugly.
Giles: "We few, we happy few."
Spike: "We band of buggered."
-
jsluder
- Posts: 6231
- Joined: Fri Jan 10, 2003 6:00 pm
- antispam: No
- Location: South of Seattle
Post
by jsluder »
dwest wrote:mutepointe wrote:chrono-synclastic infundibulum
You Kazak! That's not true!
What a rude and kurt post.
Giles: "We few, we happy few."
Spike: "We band of buggered."
-
dwest
- Posts: 7113
- Joined: Tue Aug 07, 2007 11:13 am
Post
by dwest »
jsluder wrote:dwest wrote:mutepointe wrote:chrono-synclastic infundibulum
You Kazak! That's not true!
What a rude and kurt post.
I am Utterly Indifferent.
-
Denny
- Posts: 24005
- Joined: Mon Nov 17, 2003 11:29 am
- antispam: No
- Location: N of Seattle
Post
by Denny »
jsluder wrote:Denny wrote:jsluder wrote:Or an ugly duckling.
who you callin' ugly?
My words were intended in the "takes one to know one" sense, ugly.
ah, well then, thank you!
Picture a bright blue ball just spinning, spinning free
It's dizzying, the possibilities. Ashes, Ashes all fall down.
