The Weekenders wrote:emmline wrote:The Weekenders wrote: But I truly wonder if the Idol judges have the capacity to understand how artistic Siobhan is.
That's an interesting question. I think their skills are sharpest in the area of detecting quick marketability and that's what they reward in terms of critical praise.
Lambert got far and he had marketing issues. Frankly, I think a few of the ultimate picks, thanks to the judges influence have faded from popularity quickly.
That's too bad because the forum for testing and proving talent is unique and valuable; way beyond an Amateur Hour type of thing in the past. But that's reflective of our current 15 minutes thing. Look at Lady Gaga for proof. She came and went pretty fast. Her marketing approach and appeal was like Madonna in fast forward mode.
Siobhan doesn't have near the musicality or musical maturity of Adam Lambert, so it is not a near comparison. In early seasons, I doubt a contestant like Siobhan would have been in the final 12 competition at all because originality wasn't valued. They just wanted folks that could sing karaoke-style under pressure, something that Siobhan continues to struggle with. I think Big Mike is about as good a talent as Season Two winner Reuben, but after nine seasons, that kind of old fashioned singing is no longer valued by the judges or the voters.
The judges are human, they make mistakes. It is extraordinary for anyone from anywhere to become a megastar. Having that high a standard for a TV show contest winner is a mistake. I think it is amazing that Idol has produced as many big stars as they have. There are only so many long term megastars, and only room for so many in the industry. Idol's influence on the music industry, movie industry and even Broadway, has been huge, considering it is just a TV contest for singing old stale cover songs. To think that a TV show can consistently produce megastars, if only the judges and producers were a bit smarter is illusionary thinking.
The voters are what push people through. Sometimes the voters go against the judges. This season, I am guessing that 80% of the votes are from young women 8 to 17. That hasn't been fair for the six female finalists. The first three cut were females. I think Katie was cut ahead of lesser talented men, because of the females voting for the cute guys.
As for next year, I don't think they will cancel Idol. It is on the way down, but still makes big money even with the lower ratings. "Dancing with the Stars" has similar issues to Idol, but is having a good year with ratings up 30% this season. That is due to a good crop of contestants, and the declining fortunes of competing TV show "24." Idol still goes head to head with the #1 show on TV, NCIS. The strong competition is a big reason Idol ratings are down.