jemtheflute wrote:
Suzie, I'm not much further ahead on this, and until you get it, examine it thoroughly and see how it plays, the speculation is just that.
Yes. It may play well, in the end, after all. Report has it that some indeed do. It would be a happy ending, and no harm done.
jemtheflute wrote:
Firstly, although I have no huge experience of them, I have yet to see (or, so far as I recall, see advertised) a Pakistani or Indian made keyed simple system flute with block mounted keys (has anyone else?)...
Yes.
ME. You get 'em thru Lark in the Morning, for one. There's no question of this. As I said, I owned one before I had known what's up. They're offered attractively priced as "Lark's Own Brand", or something, but in any case they are Pakistani made, "traditional block mounts" (per LITM's blurb) and all, absolutely.
jemtheflute wrote:
Secondly, that black-looking ring on the foot socket could well just be tarnished silver - the photos aren't good enough to see really, but it is certainly possible that the keys and rings are sterling; again, you'll know when you get it, but I'd say the chances are better than even that the ring actually does match when cleaned up.
Yeah, the footjoint ring is weird. I'd like to know more about that; I'm still inclined to think it's a replacement or strange repair. It's the only odd note to an otherwise very familiar flute to me. I have experience with both sterling and nickel silver metalwork; in this case I recognise the key and ferrule style, and for my money it looks for all the world to be nickel silver, even through a photograph, so my assessment's pretty inflexible, I'm afraid. Even tarnished sterling doesn't look quite like nickel silver to my eye (although a local instrument repair guy made that mistake with my well-weathered sterling keys, and I wondered what sort of eye he had despite his training).