
We're freezing our pants off over here, folks.
It has. Snow-wise, what you are seeing is unremarkable as winter scenes go in Minnesota and most of the rest of northern North America. It's a meh. Normal. Where I live, "bad snow" starts with accumulations of 5 feet - we've been there and more, before - and then you really have to figure out what to do with it all. But when you get snows like that, it's never nearly as cold as it's gotten now. Once it gets this cold, snowfall is usually negligible at most. It's an inverse correlation. One year a lot of the boulevards were piled so high that a driver couldn't see the oncoming cross-traffic. That was unusual, but it's always a possibility in milder temps. As you can see in the pic, this year we don't have near that much; you have to cross the Mississippi eastward to see the monster accumulations of this latest storm system. So MN dodged that bullet; fortunately we haven't had to deal with both heavy snows and the deepfreeze too, this year. Others haven't been so lucky.benhall.1 wrote:I thought you said the bad snow had passed you by ...
And that, folks, is a pummeling of Biblical proportions.chas wrote:I think it snowed at least several inches about three times a week from October into February.
Now, I could make the case that living in Minnesota is existentially analogous to the proper (if endlessly repeated) sauna experience, and as such is therefore most healthsome, but I'm afraid I have to admit that you simply have more sense than I.chas wrote:It's no accident that I settled south of the Mason-Dixon line.
In its defense, Bemidji does have culture.an seanduine wrote:Thought I was living in Bemidji![]()
That would be Shangri-la for an Upper Midwesterner. "Cold" is a pretty relative term with a sliding scale, so my people tend to use descriptive modifiers of increasing intensity like "not so", "a bit", "rather", "very", "bitterly", and "dangerously" (there are others, but they're unprintable here). Right now we're at dangerously cold - some call it bitter, which it is, but it's also dangerous, as the hospitals will attest; the homeless and ill-dressed are hardest hit with frostbite which, when severe, can cost you fingers, toes and ears. And, as you might guess, under prolonged exposure it can kill you. So it's no joke. No cold-related fatalities yet so far as I know, but they wouldn't come as a surprise. Me, I just have to go bundled up from my heated apartment to my nearby car to a heated shop and back again, so my exposure is typically negligible (the car takes a while to warm up, but at least you're sheltered). After this deep-cold snap is over and the temps rise to about 28F (-2C), we'll be calling it "warm, finally". As I said, it's all relative, and of course it depends on who's talking.PB+J wrote:Where I live we don't get too much below freezing very often, or for more than a few days.