Can't read it wrong

Socializing and general posts on wide-ranging topics. Remember, it's Poststructural!
User avatar
kkrell
Posts: 4831
Joined: Mon Jul 29, 2002 6:00 pm
antispam: No
Please enter the next number in sequence: 8
Tell us something.: Mostly producer of the Wooden Flute Obsession 3-volume 6-CD 7-hour set of mostly player's choice of Irish tunes, played mostly solo, on mostly wooden flutes by approximately 120 different mostly highly-rated traditional flute players & are mostly...
Location: Los Angeles
Contact:

Re: Can't read it wrong

Post by kkrell »

Nanohedron wrote:Hyphenation? Maybe it's my Yank sensibilities (stop sniggering, you dirty people), but this pedant would think that "firsthand" is better than "first-hand". Or maybe not. I don't know.
Maybe that's not where the hyphen was supposed to go.
International Traditional Music Society, Inc.
A non-profit 501c3 charity/educational public benefit corporation
Wooden Flute Obsession CDs (3 volumes, 6 discs, 7 hours, 120 players/tracks)
https://www.worldtrad.org
User avatar
Nanohedron
Moderatorer
Posts: 38211
Joined: Wed Dec 18, 2002 6:00 pm
antispam: No
Please enter the next number in sequence: 8
Tell us something.: Been a fluter, citternist, and uilleann piper; committed now to the way of the harp.

Oh, yeah: also a mod here, not a spammer. A matter of opinion, perhaps.
Location: Lefse country

Re: Can't read it wrong

Post by Nanohedron »

It occurred to me.
"If you take music out of this world, you will have nothing but a ball of fire." - Tribal musician
User avatar
DrPhill
Posts: 1610
Joined: Wed Nov 19, 2008 11:58 am
antispam: No
Please enter the next number in sequence: 10
Location: None

Re: Can't read it wrong

Post by DrPhill »

Is this a bit to close to the line? I hope not, but I read it wrong....

Video of Pope Francis trying to avoid having his ring kissed goes viral

Other papers were more cautious and used the phrase 'papal ring'.

Apologies if this is too strong for C&F, in which case please remove it.
Phill

One does not equal two. Not even for very large values of one.
User avatar
Nanohedron
Moderatorer
Posts: 38211
Joined: Wed Dec 18, 2002 6:00 pm
antispam: No
Please enter the next number in sequence: 8
Tell us something.: Been a fluter, citternist, and uilleann piper; committed now to the way of the harp.

Oh, yeah: also a mod here, not a spammer. A matter of opinion, perhaps.
Location: Lefse country

Re: Can't read it wrong

Post by Nanohedron »

Speaking only as a Yank, Right-of-the-Pond slang falls under the jurisdiction of circumlocution. It's like "pants": we don't snicker at that, either, so likewise to us the Pope's ring is merely a jeweled bauble, and nothing else. We do, however, snicker at "knock (someone) up". That's a whole different ballgame in the States.

But this is material better suited to the "Divided by a common language" thread.
"If you take music out of this world, you will have nothing but a ball of fire." - Tribal musician
User avatar
DrPhill
Posts: 1610
Joined: Wed Nov 19, 2008 11:58 am
antispam: No
Please enter the next number in sequence: 10
Location: None

Re: Can't read it wrong

Post by DrPhill »

Nanohedron wrote:.....to us the Pope's ring is merely a jeweled bauble....
I think it was the concept of 'kissing his ring' which fooled me. Perhaps it is peculiar to the circles that I have moved in, but the expression is often used as a euphemism for 'currying favour', especially in a strictly hierarchical workplace.

But maybe you are right, perhaps this is a regional language thing. Ah well, we are post-structural here.
Phill

One does not equal two. Not even for very large values of one.
User avatar
Nanohedron
Moderatorer
Posts: 38211
Joined: Wed Dec 18, 2002 6:00 pm
antispam: No
Please enter the next number in sequence: 8
Tell us something.: Been a fluter, citternist, and uilleann piper; committed now to the way of the harp.

Oh, yeah: also a mod here, not a spammer. A matter of opinion, perhaps.
Location: Lefse country

Re: Can't read it wrong

Post by Nanohedron »

DrPhill wrote:...the expression is often used as a euphemism for 'currying favour', especially in a strictly hierarchical workplace.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but during the previous snicker-fests we've had here over the phrase, I was under the distinct impression that in British slang, "ring" means the - ahem - nethermost aperture.

In that case, "currying favor" still applies, although we Yanks take a much less anatomically precise aim. Squeamishness, perhaps.

In reference to currying favor, a Yank could certainly speak of "kissing someone's ring"; the meaning would be clear, but the metaphor would be understood in terms of jewelry only, and never carry the sphincterological subtext it does in the UK. We just don't use the word that way. Should I say to fellow Yanks that I had to get my ring repaired, and should there happen to be an Anglophile among them, it would be boneheaded of him to make jokes about it, because then of course he would have go to the trouble of explaining his bon mot to those unacquainted with British parlance, which is going to be most of us. Sort of defeats the purpose of trying to be witty when you make people's eyes glaze over.
"If you take music out of this world, you will have nothing but a ball of fire." - Tribal musician
User avatar
DrPhill
Posts: 1610
Joined: Wed Nov 19, 2008 11:58 am
antispam: No
Please enter the next number in sequence: 10
Location: None

Re: Can't read it wrong

Post by DrPhill »

That was the meaning of ring as I understood it. Perhaps the center of the general target that many aim for. One hundred and eighty!
Phill

One does not equal two. Not even for very large values of one.
User avatar
Nanohedron
Moderatorer
Posts: 38211
Joined: Wed Dec 18, 2002 6:00 pm
antispam: No
Please enter the next number in sequence: 8
Tell us something.: Been a fluter, citternist, and uilleann piper; committed now to the way of the harp.

Oh, yeah: also a mod here, not a spammer. A matter of opinion, perhaps.
Location: Lefse country

Re: Can't read it wrong

Post by Nanohedron »

DrPhill wrote:One hundred and eighty!
Had to look that up. That's "bullseye" to you non-dart-playing Yanks out there.

But what on Middle Earth was Tolkien thinking when he titled his famous trilogy? Surely he must have known that his countrymen would roll on the floor laughing at its mere mention.
"If you take music out of this world, you will have nothing but a ball of fire." - Tribal musician
User avatar
benhall.1
Moderator
Posts: 14797
Joined: Wed Jan 14, 2009 5:21 pm
antispam: No
Please enter the next number in sequence: 8
Tell us something.: I'm a fiddler and, latterly, a fluter. I love the flute. I wish I'd always played it. I love the whistle as well. I'm blessed in having really lovely instruments for all of my musical interests.
Location: Unimportant island off the great mainland of Europe

Re: Can't read it wrong

Post by benhall.1 »

Nanohedron wrote:
DrPhill wrote:One hundred and eighty!
Had to look that up. That's "bullseye" to you non-dart-playing Yanks out there.

But what on Middle Earth was Tolkien thinking when he titled his famous trilogy? Surely he must have known that his countrymen would roll on the floor laughing at its mere mention.
I've never heard of anyone sniggering at The Lord of the Rings. I suspect it's that the plural renders it unambiguous.
User avatar
DrPhill
Posts: 1610
Joined: Wed Nov 19, 2008 11:58 am
antispam: No
Please enter the next number in sequence: 10
Location: None

Re: Can't read it wrong

Post by DrPhill »

For me the word 'ring' in most contexts is smut-neutral. The only reason I picked up on this headline was its similarity to the phrase 'kissing his ring', which for me is smut-positive.

I never thought of Tolkien's theme as smut-positive, and I will now try to forget that suggestion.
Phill

One does not equal two. Not even for very large values of one.
User avatar
Nanohedron
Moderatorer
Posts: 38211
Joined: Wed Dec 18, 2002 6:00 pm
antispam: No
Please enter the next number in sequence: 8
Tell us something.: Been a fluter, citternist, and uilleann piper; committed now to the way of the harp.

Oh, yeah: also a mod here, not a spammer. A matter of opinion, perhaps.
Location: Lefse country

Re: Can't read it wrong

Post by Nanohedron »

benhall.1 wrote:I've never heard of anyone sniggering at The Lord of the Rings. I suspect it's that the plural renders it unambiguous.
Or it's like the difference between coriander and coriander. :poke:

For me, the plural is immaterial; it just indicates that the Lord of the Rings rules them all, if you will. Sorry to be getting gnarly, but you see the possibilities. :wink:
DrPhill wrote:I never thought of Tolkien's theme as smut-positive, and I will now try to forget that suggestion.
Oh, have I created a monster? You're welcome. :twisted:

Honestly, though, I would think that of all demographics that ought to have gone there first, it should have been yours, not mine, wherein "ring" conventionally lacks any scatological meaning whatsoever. Frankly, I'm surprised. Call it a fresh perspective if you like, but you have to admit the working material's been there for you all along. Me, I'm just an outsider who happened to walk by.

This might be a perfect illustration of the Japanese adage, "Living at the base of a lighthouse" (tōdai moto kurashi); as the base is the darkest, so it is that it's hard to see what's closest to home.

Here's how I see it: When you give a word multiple meanings, all those meanings are available at once, to greater and lesser degrees of success. IOW, even though context determines conventional meaning, convention does not make meaning 100% ironclad (and my perspective should be proof enough of that). Of course this potential for ambiguity is one of the bases on which we build jokes.
"If you take music out of this world, you will have nothing but a ball of fire." - Tribal musician
User avatar
benhall.1
Moderator
Posts: 14797
Joined: Wed Jan 14, 2009 5:21 pm
antispam: No
Please enter the next number in sequence: 8
Tell us something.: I'm a fiddler and, latterly, a fluter. I love the flute. I wish I'd always played it. I love the whistle as well. I'm blessed in having really lovely instruments for all of my musical interests.
Location: Unimportant island off the great mainland of Europe

Re: Can't read it wrong

Post by benhall.1 »

Nanohedron wrote:
benhall.1 wrote:I've never heard of anyone sniggering at The Lord of the Rings. I suspect it's that the plural renders it unambiguous.
Or it's like the difference between coriander and coriander. :poke:
Yes, I still don't get what possible confusion there could be there. :-?
Nanohedron wrote:Here's how I see it: When you give a word multiple meanings, all those meanings are available at once, to greater and lesser degrees of success. IOW, even though context determines conventional meaning, convention does not make meaning 100% ironclad (and my perspective should be proof enough of that). This potential for ambiguity is one of the bases on which we build jokes.
It doesn't work like that for me. I don't think it works like that at all over here. There has to be a real contextual ambiguity - otherwise, it just feels forced, to us. So, the Pope objecting to someone "kissing his ring" has the contextual ambiguity built in, in the whole phrase; whereas "Lord of the Rings" can only have one meaning. It makes no difference that the singular of one of those words, in a completely different context, has a different meaning. It's too much of a stretch.

I do have another example, from Oklahoma, no less, that has always amused me, at least. Gertie has just got engaged, and excitedly says to her pals, "Have you seen my ring, girls?" :o
User avatar
Nanohedron
Moderatorer
Posts: 38211
Joined: Wed Dec 18, 2002 6:00 pm
antispam: No
Please enter the next number in sequence: 8
Tell us something.: Been a fluter, citternist, and uilleann piper; committed now to the way of the harp.

Oh, yeah: also a mod here, not a spammer. A matter of opinion, perhaps.
Location: Lefse country

Re: Can't read it wrong

Post by Nanohedron »

benhall.1 wrote:So, the Pope objecting to someone "kissing his ring" has the contextual ambiguity built in, in the whole phrase; whereas "Lord of the Rings" can only have one meaning. It makes no difference that the singular of one of those words, in a completely different context, has a different meaning. It's too much of a stretch.
But the ambiguity wouldn't be there if you didn't assign such a meaning to the word in the first place, you see. For me, once a meaning is assigned, it is not necessarily bound by convention. Poets understand this. :love:
benhall.1 wrote:I do have another example, from Oklahoma, no less, that has always amused me, at least. Gertie has just got engaged, and excitedly says to her pals, "Have you seen my ring, girls?" :o
But here there was no aforementioned kissing. So how does this differ substantially from from me getting a laugh out of turning The Lord of the Rings on its head? I see the ambiguity built in no matter where you look. Your slang usage is one that begs to be played with, so if we're to speak of forced, it strikes me as far more of a stretch that Gertie would offer a look at her main exit, and less so that the "Lord of the Rings" - whoever that might be - would have a stable of 'em at his disposal, let us characterize it. There are websites and movies in that vein, you know (or so one hears :wink: ). In fact, if some British S&M entrepreneur hasn't yet appropriated the book title tongue-in-cheek for one of those, I think it's a missed opportunity!
"If you take music out of this world, you will have nothing but a ball of fire." - Tribal musician
Tor
Posts: 399
Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 6:23 am
antispam: No
Please enter the next number in sequence: 8
Location: Europe and Japan

Re: Can't read it wrong

Post by Tor »

benhall.1 wrote:
Nanohedron wrote:Here's how I see it: When you give a word multiple meanings, all those meanings are available at once, to greater and lesser degrees of success. IOW, even though context determines conventional meaning, convention does not make meaning 100% ironclad (and my perspective should be proof enough of that). This potential for ambiguity is one of the bases on which we build jokes.
It doesn't work like that for me. I don't think it works like that at all over here. There has to be a real contextual ambiguity - otherwise, it just feels forced, to us. [..]
That's how it feels for me as well, or even more so, as a non-native English speaker. It'll just be like Beavis and Butthead otherwise ("hehe he said <insert anything>")
User avatar
Nanohedron
Moderatorer
Posts: 38211
Joined: Wed Dec 18, 2002 6:00 pm
antispam: No
Please enter the next number in sequence: 8
Tell us something.: Been a fluter, citternist, and uilleann piper; committed now to the way of the harp.

Oh, yeah: also a mod here, not a spammer. A matter of opinion, perhaps.
Location: Lefse country

Re: Can't read it wrong

Post by Nanohedron »

Tor wrote:
benhall.1 wrote:
Nanohedron wrote:Here's how I see it: When you give a word multiple meanings, all those meanings are available at once, to greater and lesser degrees of success. IOW, even though context determines conventional meaning, convention does not make meaning 100% ironclad (and my perspective should be proof enough of that). This potential for ambiguity is one of the bases on which we build jokes.
It doesn't work like that for me. I don't think it works like that at all over here. There has to be a real contextual ambiguity - otherwise, it just feels forced, to us. [..]
That's how it feels for me as well, or even more so, as a non-native English speaker. It'll just be like Beavis and Butthead otherwise ("hehe he said <insert anything>")
Sorry, Tor; since you quote both Ben and me, I'm not sure which way you mean, nor does the reference to Beavis and Butthead help, as your tastes in the matter are not really made clear. But I'll go out on a limb and guess you were siding with Ben...

FWIW, I was never a fan of the Beavis and Butthead schtick. For me there's a difference between indulging in low wit and the callow habit of seeking out the smut in anything, as in the case of Messrs. B & B. But Ben is amused by Gertie's ring, whereas the joke falls flat for me; I don't know whether this is cultural or personal. I need other contexts for it to work to my satisfaction, and LotR does it nicely, precisely because violating such a beloved institution is so awful. :twisted:
"If you take music out of this world, you will have nothing but a ball of fire." - Tribal musician
Post Reply