uillmann wrote:I suppose this is intended to be a theoretical drone stock, as fail to see how this design would supply air to the regulators.
Torrin is correct. My model was rushed, and reflected more how I would envision such a ring incorporated to "join" the resonating chambers of the drone reeds, rather than the configuration of the original drone stock of note. Also, as regulators, whether in a hollow or solid mainstock, do not exist in the same chamber as the drones, addition of regulator sockets would only complicate an already rushed illustration. The exception would be in the rare (in the last century) mainstock which does not incorporate a drone cutoff switch.
uillmann wrote:In any event, any coupling achieved by the drone tongues will be pretty hard to discern with an oscilloscope.
Actually, close miking of each drone, with a bit of acoustical dampening between should yield serviceable waveforms. I experimented with this last evening, and with a shotgun mic, and a bit of cotton batting misappropriated from the wife's Christmas tree skirt, I was able to isolate each tone tolerably. This was with a solid mainstock as I've no hollow mainstocks in hand.
uillmann wrote: Even if it did happen, in real life it wouldn't sound nice, as we tend to hear low pitches lower than they really are, and high ones higher, (one of the reasons why pianos are not tuned to simple mathematical ratio.)
The altering of pitch, from true, to get a pianoforte sounding psychologically "in tune" across seven (7) octaves is done progressively to the extremes of the range. The range between the tenor and bass drones is two (2) octaves. When I tune my drones, I normally tune the baritone first to the chanter, and then the bass to the baritone, the tenor to the baritone, and finally the tenor against the bass, with a goal of zero detection of beat frequency. Is this incorrect?
uillmann wrote: Not only that, but no drone is going to remain completely reactionless to the needs of a chanter. I'm afraid the best we can hope for is a reasonably steady pitch and pleasant tone.
Please don' take this question the wrong way: How much effect would a chanter reed, separated from the drone reeds by a small diameter tube, a lossy-walled bag, and constricted (between the drone cutoff switch and the drone socket) passage effect the drone reeds compared to drone reeds interaction in the close proximity of a common chamber?
What I'm going to try to detect, is whether the resulting pressure waves are in phase when inside the mainstock. They likely will not be when exiting the individual drones due to differences in bore profiles between the drones, resulting in drone lengths which are not doublings when moving from tenor to baritone to bass. However, the speed of sound, irrespective of drone bore profile is consistent (I'm going to assume an adiabatic process since the amount of airflow, from what I can detect, does not approach that of a significant pressure increase due to drone backpressure), so adjustments can be calculated. All of this may not sway anyone from their current viewpoint, but I am a point where I need to do something to satisfy my own curiosity, to the level that I can reasonably achieve. If you disagree with whatever I present, put together an empirical exercise of your own, and present your refutation.
As I should have stated long before this point, I greatly appreciate everyone's input on this subject. I don't know if this will result in anything satisfying to you or me, but I'm tired of mentally kicking this can down the road.
dave boling