I need your feedback
Posted: Thu Mar 22, 2018 3:13 pm
Dear pipers, I'm interested in your feedback...
I'm about to create my own enterprise and I would really appreciate your opinion on my inventions.
Am I completely misguided, or do you think that they may interest some clients?
It's really about getting honest opinions, not an attempt to be flattered.
Here is a remainder of the principles that inform my work.
It's about improving, as much as technical means allow it, the musical capacities of the instrument, without losing the qualities that the elders had.
This evolution could be compared to that of classical instruments in the 19th century, except that our demands in terms of accoustics and tuning aren't the same.
My work focuses on two areas: mechanics and reedmaking.
Mechanics allowed for:
- a more ergonomic key system on the chanter;
- a stabilisation of the holding of the regulators' tuning thanks to a circuit which cools their air supply;
- a regulator keybord that enables more chords to be played in a normal way.
Onto reedmaking, I try to get as close as possible of the ideal reached by Leo Rowsome, i.e., well tuned and easy to play instruments with a generous sound. I made great progress, and research is still going on...
At this point in my work, your feedback is precious to me.
What are your critiques, doubts/reserves, questions?
What are your expectations?
What would you consider the ideal set to be like?
What do you think of the evolution that I propose?
Don't hesitate to give your sincere opinion.
I need to know what the weather's like, so to speak.
I'm about to create my own enterprise and I would really appreciate your opinion on my inventions.
Am I completely misguided, or do you think that they may interest some clients?
It's really about getting honest opinions, not an attempt to be flattered.
Here is a remainder of the principles that inform my work.
It's about improving, as much as technical means allow it, the musical capacities of the instrument, without losing the qualities that the elders had.
This evolution could be compared to that of classical instruments in the 19th century, except that our demands in terms of accoustics and tuning aren't the same.
My work focuses on two areas: mechanics and reedmaking.
Mechanics allowed for:
- a more ergonomic key system on the chanter;
- a stabilisation of the holding of the regulators' tuning thanks to a circuit which cools their air supply;
- a regulator keybord that enables more chords to be played in a normal way.
Onto reedmaking, I try to get as close as possible of the ideal reached by Leo Rowsome, i.e., well tuned and easy to play instruments with a generous sound. I made great progress, and research is still going on...
At this point in my work, your feedback is precious to me.
What are your critiques, doubts/reserves, questions?
What are your expectations?
What would you consider the ideal set to be like?
What do you think of the evolution that I propose?
Don't hesitate to give your sincere opinion.
I need to know what the weather's like, so to speak.