Better a Moeck or Mollenhauer recorder

A place for players of other folk/world music wind instruments.
Post Reply
LucaLuigi72
Posts: 12
Joined: Wed Jun 22, 2016 10:59 am
antispam: No
Please enter the next number in sequence: 8
Tell us something.: I'm italian and I would like to have some information for recorder flute.
In particular I would like to buy a soprano recorder of grenadilla or rosewood and I'm not sure between the 2 woods and if take a Moeck or Mollenhauer.

Better a Moeck or Mollenhauer recorder

Post by LucaLuigi72 »

I have 2 recorder:
One old cheep mapple soprano Mollenhauer and an alto boxwood Moeck.
I would like to buy an other soprano recorder because the old one is rather spoiled and out of tune.
I think to buy a Moeck or a Mollenhauer with tulipwood or grenadilla wood.
Probably I prefer grenafilla but I'm not sure: I dont want a shrill sound: soprano is already quite acute!

I was oriented in Denner grenadilla Mollenhauer because the Mollenhauer site say that denner is "agile, quick response in all registers": I would like to have no problems with highest sounds: not difficult to obtein and good quality of sound.
With boxwood alto Moeck I have big problems with condensation (problem that I dont have with the cheep mapple Mollenhauer...) and highest sounds are muffled.

Do you think Denner Mollenhauer is the best choice or it is better Rottenburgh Moeck?:
Thomann shop say Moeck is more professional and usually fewer people return the instrument.
User avatar
Peter Duggan
Posts: 3223
Joined: Tue Aug 30, 2011 5:39 pm
antispam: No
Please enter the next number in sequence: 8
Tell us something.: I'm not registering, I'm trying to edit my profile! The field “Tell us something.” is too short, a minimum of 100 characters is required.
Location: Kinlochleven
Contact:

Re: Better a Moeck or Mollenhauer recorder

Post by Peter Duggan »

LucaLuigi72 wrote:Do you think Denner Mollenhauer is the best choice or it is better Rottenburgh Moeck?
Impossible to say. You need to try both (ideally more than one of each) and make up your own mind.
Thomann shop say Moeck is more professional and usually fewer people return the instrument.
Perhaps more people keep the Moeck because they assume that to be the case? The Moeck Rottenburgh has been a well-regarded recorder for a long time now, but that doesn't necessarily make it great or even 'professional'. And both makes/models are expensive enough in the woods you're talking about to be risky blind experiments...
And we in dreams behold the Hebrides.

Master of nine?
User avatar
kkrell
Posts: 4828
Joined: Mon Jul 29, 2002 6:00 pm
antispam: No
Please enter the next number in sequence: 8
Tell us something.: Mostly producer of the Wooden Flute Obsession 3-volume 6-CD 7-hour set of mostly player's choice of Irish tunes, played mostly solo, on mostly wooden flutes by approximately 120 different mostly highly-rated traditional flute players & are mostly...
Location: Los Angeles
Contact:

Re: Better a Moeck or Mollenhauer recorder

Post by kkrell »

Possibly the one to ask is C&F member "Loren" (Loren Bookbinder), who used to work for the Von Huene workshop. Would likely know more about the repair and performance history of those respective instruments.

memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=138
LucaLuigi72
Posts: 12
Joined: Wed Jun 22, 2016 10:59 am
antispam: No
Please enter the next number in sequence: 8
Tell us something.: I'm italian and I would like to have some information for recorder flute.
In particular I would like to buy a soprano recorder of grenadilla or rosewood and I'm not sure between the 2 woods and if take a Moeck or Mollenhauer.

Re: Better a Moeck or Mollenhauer recorder

Post by LucaLuigi72 »

Peter Duggan wrote:
LucaLuigi72 wrote:Do you think Denner Mollenhauer is the best choice or it is better Rottenburgh Moeck?
Impossible to say. You need to try both (ideally more than one of each) and make up your own mind.
The problem is that I have only one shop in Italy near enought to see instruments: he have only Mollenhauer (a lot of them) but is not possible to try recorders for hygienic reasons and for the cost of cleaning the instruments.
User avatar
krystlepye
Posts: 101
Joined: Sun Aug 24, 2014 10:32 am
antispam: No
Please enter the next number in sequence: 8
Location: Western Washington State

Re: Better a Moeck or Mollenhauer recorder

Post by krystlepye »

Did you make a decision/purchase yet?
Mae
Posts: 79
Joined: Thu Sep 22, 2016 9:58 pm
antispam: No
Please enter the next number in sequence: 8
Tell us something.: I'm a recorder player, but I've been dabbling in Irish whistles and Native American flutes. I'm always interested in learning more.
Location: US

Re: Better a Moeck or Mollenhauer recorder

Post by Mae »

Hi, I'm new to the site, so I'm sorry if I got to your post on the late side. If you haven't already made a choice yet, from your preferences, you might want to go with the grenadilla rather than tulipwood. The grenadilla has a clearer, more open tone, whereas tulipwood has a more reedy tone (akin to oboes), and great on the overtones. I tend to favor tulipwood over grenadilla, but that is a matter of taste. I suspect you would prefer the grenadilla.

I do have a Mollenhauer Denner in Pearwood, and I can say that I don't have problems with condensation with that one. It's the one I use when I want to practice a longer period time on wood (I mostly practice difficult sections on my plastic Aulos before trying them out on the wood because I want to get the fingering speed and accuracy down). I'm assuming you are regularly oiling your recorders regularly, because that will help with the tone? Even wax-impregnated woods can start to lose a bit in wear, so I do give a light oiling inside the bore on those (touch the inside of the bore if you can to check for dryness and roughness).

Both the Rottenburgh and Denner in grenadilla for soprano and alto are pretty close in price, from what I can see at my local shop. Also, you can check locally to see if anyone has used instruments to sell. I think a third of my current instruments had been purchased used.

Good luck!
LucaLuigi72
Posts: 12
Joined: Wed Jun 22, 2016 10:59 am
antispam: No
Please enter the next number in sequence: 8
Tell us something.: I'm italian and I would like to have some information for recorder flute.
In particular I would like to buy a soprano recorder of grenadilla or rosewood and I'm not sure between the 2 woods and if take a Moeck or Mollenhauer.

Re: Better a Moeck or Mollenhauer recorder

Post by LucaLuigi72 »

I have bought an used Mollenhauer denner in pearwood and a new Moeck rottemburgh in tulipwood.
I'm not very satisfied with the pearwood denner because it is a little out of tune: it have some intonation problems.
I'm really happy for Moeck in tulipwood: intonation seems perfect and sound is good. I dont know if grenadilla could be better for me but tulipwood is good!

In my opinion mollenhauer denner have stronger sound than moeck rottemburgh and the most hight notes are slightly more easy to play... but I prefear the moeck quality of sound.
Mae
Posts: 79
Joined: Thu Sep 22, 2016 9:58 pm
antispam: No
Please enter the next number in sequence: 8
Tell us something.: I'm a recorder player, but I've been dabbling in Irish whistles and Native American flutes. I'm always interested in learning more.
Location: US

Re: Better a Moeck or Mollenhauer recorder

Post by Mae »

I'm glad you found a recorder that you like! And in my favorite type of wood. Since you bought the Mollenhauer used, there is a possibility that how it was stored and cared for will affect the intonation. Are the notes playing consistently flat by almost a semi-tone? That would indicate that you have an instrument tuned A=415. I have a Roessler soprano in grenadilla in that tuning, and it threw me off until I realized it was in that tuning.

I do have to blow and be more precise on my finger work when playing my tulipwood soprano, so it's just more practice.
LucaLuigi72
Posts: 12
Joined: Wed Jun 22, 2016 10:59 am
antispam: No
Please enter the next number in sequence: 8
Tell us something.: I'm italian and I would like to have some information for recorder flute.
In particular I would like to buy a soprano recorder of grenadilla or rosewood and I'm not sure between the 2 woods and if take a Moeck or Mollenhauer.

Re: Better a Moeck or Mollenhauer recorder

Post by LucaLuigi72 »

The problem is that there are some rising notes in the higher octave: in particular the high si (B) is a little higher than normal. I think there are some other little problem of intonation in other notes.
It is noticeable in particular when you begin to play and the recorder is cold. But I have not this problem with the Moeck Rottemburgh and with an old cheap Mollenhauer soprano even when they are cold.
Mae
Posts: 79
Joined: Thu Sep 22, 2016 9:58 pm
antispam: No
Please enter the next number in sequence: 8
Tell us something.: I'm a recorder player, but I've been dabbling in Irish whistles and Native American flutes. I'm always interested in learning more.
Location: US

Re: Better a Moeck or Mollenhauer recorder

Post by Mae »

Yeah, that doesn't seem good at all. It's not consistent, and it's going sharp. I would try oiling it and letting it sit for a whole day, then practice 15 minutes one day, 20 minutes next day, and add 5 minutes each day of practicing until you get up to your full practice time. It may be that the recorder needs breaking in again. But that is all I can recommend.

I really need to practice more again. I'm good up to the high G, then anything above that, I hit them correctly about 75% of the time. Terrible. I was more accurate when I was a child because I practiced every day, but these days, I can play much faster and with more expression.
Post Reply