It is currently Wed May 22, 2013 10:13 pm

All times are UTC - 8 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 81 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next
Author Message
 
 Post subject: Re: Wilkes flutes, then and now
PostPosted: Fri Jun 29, 2012 12:24 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jul 29, 2002 4:00 pm
Posts: 2754
Location: Los Angeles
benhall.1 wrote:
OK. I got as far as this: if you have no flute, then there will be no quirks and limitations.


That's not right, either. My reading gets me "Every (any) simple system flute will have some quirks and limitations."


Top
 Profile E-mail  
 
 
 Post subject: Re: Wilkes flutes, then and now
PostPosted: Fri Jun 29, 2012 12:52 am 
Offline
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 14, 2009 3:21 pm
Posts: 6394
Location: UK, Herefordshire/Gloucestershire border
kkrell wrote:
benhall.1 wrote:
OK. I got as far as this: if you have no flute, then there will be no quirks and limitations.


That's not right, either. My reading gets me "Every (any) simple system flute will have some quirks and limitations."


Did you??!?? Oh well, if that's what he meant, why didn't he say so? That makes perfect sense. :) A bit blindingly obvious, but still ...

_________________
"Only connect!"


Top
 Profile E-mail  
 
 
 Post subject: Re: Wilkes flutes, then and now
PostPosted: Fri Jun 29, 2012 1:09 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 23, 2006 4:47 am
Posts: 5873
Location: N.E. Wales, G.B.
Now you're just being obtuse, Hall. The meaning is quite obvious (to others, apparently) even with the redundant double negative. Just invert them, as Kevin showed. Simples.

_________________
I respect people's privilege to hold their beliefs, whatever those may be (within reason), but respect the beliefs themselves? You gotta be kidding!

Antique 8-key flute For Sale (video)
Low Bb flute: Xmas Eve & The Providence (audio)
Flute & Music Resources - helpsheet downloads


Top
 Profile E-mail  
 
 
 Post subject: Re: Wilkes flutes, then and now
PostPosted: Fri Jun 29, 2012 1:31 am 
Offline
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 14, 2009 3:21 pm
Posts: 6394
Location: UK, Herefordshire/Gloucestershire border
jemtheflute wrote:
Now you're just being obtuse, Hall. The meaning is quite obvious (to others, apparently) even with the redundant double negative. Just invert them, as Kevin showed. Simples.


Me? Obtuse? Why, I was called "acute" only yesterday! At least, I think that's what they said ...

_________________
"Only connect!"


Top
 Profile E-mail  
 
 
 Post subject: Re: Wilkes flutes, then and now
PostPosted: Fri Jun 29, 2012 1:44 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jun 11, 2012 5:58 pm
Posts: 72
Ok, maybe my post was not so interesting... and better don't write "fourteen years ago" (yes, a long waiting list, but I have another flute and I could wait: otherwise, no Wilkes, unless you find it on Ebay, but it's not so easy, less for me being left handed)...

Any opinion more, strictly focused on the topic?


Top
 Profile E-mail  
 
 
 Post subject: Re: Wilkes flutes, then and now
PostPosted: Fri Jun 29, 2012 1:57 am 
Offline
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 14, 2009 3:21 pm
Posts: 6394
Location: UK, Herefordshire/Gloucestershire border
Etruscan wrote:
Ok, maybe my post was not so interesting... and better don't write "fourteen years ago" (yes, a long waiting list, but I have another flute and I could wait: otherwise, no Wilkes, unless you find it on Ebay, but it's not so easy, less for me being left handed)...

Any opinion more, strictly focused on the topic?


Your post was extremely interesting, in my opinion, Etruscan, not least because, as I say, I too am on that waiting list. Hopefully, only another 10 years to go now.

I know Chris well (as does Jem), and that waiting list is entirely reasonable and practical - for him. Also, the flutes are so good that you hardly ever see them being re-sold, so yes, getting on the waiting list is the way to go if you want one. They're worth it, in my opinion. And even more so now than ever.

_________________
"Only connect!"


Top
 Profile E-mail  
 
 
 Post subject: Re: Wilkes flutes, then and now
PostPosted: Fri Jun 29, 2012 2:53 am 
Offline
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 14, 2009 3:21 pm
Posts: 6394
Location: UK, Herefordshire/Gloucestershire border
Just to add some specifics:

I know reasonably well two older Wilkes flutes, one from about 20 years ago and one from 13 years ago. The one from 20 years ago is lovely, but is lighter in weight, feels less solid and has a very sweet, and somewhat gentle tone. It's not a flute to really push, although I've seen Chris himself push it and it sounded fine. The one from 13 years ago happens to be one of the best flutes I've ever met. It feels much more solid, is heavier to hold, and, at the least provocation, will split eardrums at a distance of several miles.

The newer ones that I've met are more like that second one. But Chris makes for players, and it may well be that there were specific characteristics that each of the owners of the above flutes were after when Chris was making their flutes. So you can't really say that the above shows a development over time. We'd need to have more examples from people to draw that sort of conclusion.

I ought perhaps to mention that Chris himself wouldn't take my opinion on any of this stuff - he just wouldn't think I was remotely qualified to give an opinion. And he'd be right. But they're my impressions, nonetheless.

_________________
"Only connect!"


Top
 Profile E-mail  
 
 
 Post subject: Re: Wilkes flutes, then and now
PostPosted: Fri Jun 29, 2012 3:49 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 01, 2006 5:46 am
Posts: 1858
Location: Galway, Ireland
I've played John Rynne's Wilkes, large hole Rudall style, it had an ivoy embouchure. He claims it was Chris' first flute, but it seems very unlikely to me. It was an older one anyway. I was very impressed, strong and heavy unlike the one Ben tried. Not the easiest flute to play perhaps, but really nice. John said it can be a bitch sometimes, but he always sounds amazing on it (well, he's some player, one of the best I've heard).
I've also tried Jean-Michel Veillon's Wilkes, I think it may be less than 10 years old. Not much dissimilar from John Rynne's, maybe a bit easier, but had a similar impression fro it.
This being said, I've had them for a few seconds only...

_________________
Formerly known as Othannen.
What I wrote in the past doesn't necessarily reflect what I think now...


Top
 Profile  
 
 
 Post subject: Re: Wilkes flutes, then and now
PostPosted: Fri Jun 29, 2012 4:35 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 23, 2006 4:47 am
Posts: 5873
Location: N.E. Wales, G.B.
benhall.1 wrote:
jemtheflute wrote:
Now you're just being obtuse, Hall. The meaning is quite obvious (to others, apparently) even with the redundant double negative. Just invert them, as Kevin showed. Simples.


Me? Obtuse? Why, I was called "acute" only yesterday! At least, I think that's what they said ...

I suppose it's a matter of degree. What angle were "they" looking from? Not a complementary one, right? This could get protract(or)ed.....

_________________
I respect people's privilege to hold their beliefs, whatever those may be (within reason), but respect the beliefs themselves? You gotta be kidding!

Antique 8-key flute For Sale (video)
Low Bb flute: Xmas Eve & The Providence (audio)
Flute & Music Resources - helpsheet downloads


Top
 Profile E-mail  
 
 
 Post subject: Re: Wilkes flutes, then and now
PostPosted: Fri Jun 29, 2012 5:49 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Nov 22, 2011 9:34 pm
Posts: 109
Location: New York
benhall.1 quoting JEM wrote:
if you have no flute, then there will be no quirks and limitations.


this is a brilliant sentence.
and certainly not untrue.


Top
 Profile E-mail  
 
 
 Post subject: Re: Wilkes flutes, then and now
PostPosted: Fri Jun 29, 2012 6:09 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jun 11, 2012 5:58 pm
Posts: 72
Here we are again... :sleep:


Top
 Profile E-mail  
 
 
 Post subject: Re: Wilkes flutes, then and now
PostPosted: Fri Jun 29, 2012 6:24 am 
Offline
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 14, 2009 3:21 pm
Posts: 6394
Location: UK, Herefordshire/Gloucestershire border
Etruscan wrote:
Here we are again... :sleep:


It's a forum, Etruscan, what did you expect? Let people have their levity. You're getting some serious replies from some knowledgeable people here amongst the others. If you want that to continue, I would suggest that it is in your interest not to carp.

Also, you're new around here. I would suggest that you get used to the culture a bit before appearing to attack perfectly friendly folk engaging in a bit of light banter on your thread.

Ben - Moderator

_________________
"Only connect!"


Top
 Profile E-mail  
 
 
 Post subject: Re: Wilkes flutes, then and now
PostPosted: Fri Jun 29, 2012 6:28 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2001 4:00 pm
Posts: 7403
Location: Boston, MA.
Etruscan wrote:
Here we are again... :sleep:


Ah yes, now you are starting to understand how it works around here. Consider yourself lucky to have sussed it out only 11 posts in, unfortunate others spend years trying to get straight answers before they see the light. :wink:

Although I have owned just about every other worthwhile flute over the years, I've not had the pleasure of owning or even playing a Wilkes, otherwise I'd contribute something more helpful here.

That said, I AM looking for a Boxwood Wilkes flute, preferably nitric acid stained, but I won't be picky about the latter if someone should have a Boxwood Wilkes they'd consider selling. In all seriousness, please contact me.



Loren


Top
 Profile E-mail  
 
 
 Post subject: Re: Wilkes flutes, then and now
PostPosted: Fri Jun 29, 2012 6:31 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Nov 17, 2003 9:29 am
Posts: 24003
Location: N of Seattle
serious long shot, that

_________________
Picture a bright blue ball just spinning, spinning free
It's dizzying, the possibilities. Ashes, Ashes all fall down.


Top
 Profile  
 
 
 Post subject: Re: Wilkes flutes, then and now
PostPosted: Fri Jun 29, 2012 6:32 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 01, 2006 5:46 am
Posts: 1858
Location: Galway, Ireland
...and anyway, your flute is almost ready, so you'll find out soon yourself. Nothing would change (if not in your head) if somebody said "new Wilkes are complete crap"... My answer above was only for the sake of conversation really :wink:

_________________
Formerly known as Othannen.
What I wrote in the past doesn't necessarily reflect what I think now...


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 81 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next

All times are UTC - 8 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google and 0 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group
[ Time : 0.818s | 10 Queries | GZIP : On ]
(dh)