We've All Been OT!!!

Our first forum for instruments you don't blow.
User avatar
Nanohedron
Moderatorer
Posts: 38226
Joined: Wed Dec 18, 2002 6:00 pm
antispam: No
Please enter the next number in sequence: 8
Tell us something.: Been a fluter, citternist, and uilleann piper; committed now to the way of the harp.

Oh, yeah: also a mod here, not a spammer. A matter of opinion, perhaps.
Location: Lefse country

We've All Been OT!!!

Post by Nanohedron »

This is the forum for Traditional STRING Instruments. I haven't seen a single post about twine, for example.

Dale, please give us a new forum for Traditional Stringed Instruments so we can rectify this glaring oversight.

My apologies to all for having offended.

:D
"If you take music out of this world, you will have nothing but a ball of fire." - Balochi musician
User avatar
HDSarah
Posts: 529
Joined: Tue Dec 17, 2002 6:00 pm
antispam: No
Location: 64.9 deg N, 147.6 deg W
Contact:

Post by HDSarah »

It's ok, Nano. It's like saying ''hammer dulcimer'' instead of ''hammered dulcimer.'' I think we're safe. :)

As corruptions of the English language go, it isn't as bad as most. My pet peeve (ok, one of many! :P ) is the transformation of nouns into verbs. I was recently at a meeting where the leader kept saying ''We've been TASKED with . . .'' That one really grates on me for some reason.
ICE JAM: "dam" good music that won't leave you cold. Check out our CD at http://cdbaby.com/cd/icejam
User avatar
SteveK
Posts: 1545
Joined: Sun Dec 02, 2001 6:00 pm
Please enter the next number in sequence: 1
Location: London, Ontario

Post by SteveK »

Once I had an ole banjo
It was strung with twine
The only song it ever would play
Was Trouble on my Mind.
User avatar
Darwin
Posts: 2719
Joined: Sat Jan 03, 2004 2:38 am
Please enter the next number in sequence: 1
Location: Flower Mound, TX
Contact:

Post by Darwin »

HDSarah wrote:My pet peeve (ok, one of many! :P ) is the transformation of nouns into verbs. I was recently at a meeting where the leader kept saying ''We've been TASKED with . . .'' That one really grates on me for some reason.
You'll want to stay away from the Chinese languages, then.

The verbification (I don't dare say "verbing") of nouns is pretty common in English, too, though.

Would you never chair a meeting, table a discussion, fish for your supper, host a party, sandpaper a board, knife a friend in the back, ax a suggestion, dog an enemy, cat around town, worm your way out of a tight spot, vacuum a rug, string popcorn, paper a room, tile a floor, bomb a bunker, ship a package, cart firewood, truck vegetables to market, water a plant, number someone among your friends, finger a squealer, hand someone a napkin, eye a cutie pie, head a group, arm your forces, elbow (or shoulder, or nose) someone aside, book a suspect, tower over a child, lord it over a subordinate, shoe a horse, flour a countertop, light a lamp, gun down a rival, tongue a trumpet, trumpet your name to a crowd, fiddle while Rome burns, needle an opponent, cement a driveway, tar a road, score an opera, frost a cake, sugar your coffee, milk a cow, telephone a friend, poison an enemy, radio for help, skin a deer, ski down a mountain, circle the block, hammer a nail, or nail a board?

What's funny about "task" is that it derives from the Medieval Latin verb taxare, "to tax", so it's actually a noun that is derived from a verb.

Its use to mean "to assign a task to" appears in my 1969 Random House Dictionary of the English Language, so it's not exactly new. This is not to say that the sample you quoted is not obnoxious bureaucratese, just that it's perfectly good English.

(That list was hard to come up with, although any English dictionary will show thousands of words that are both verbs and nouns. My American Heritage seems to show many more nouns derived from verbs than the other way around.)
Mike Wright

"When an idea is wanting, a word can always be found to take its place."
 --Goethe
User avatar
Nanohedron
Moderatorer
Posts: 38226
Joined: Wed Dec 18, 2002 6:00 pm
antispam: No
Please enter the next number in sequence: 8
Tell us something.: Been a fluter, citternist, and uilleann piper; committed now to the way of the harp.

Oh, yeah: also a mod here, not a spammer. A matter of opinion, perhaps.
Location: Lefse country

Post by Nanohedron »

As long as we're really being OT, now...

All very well and good, dear Darwin (mind you, I agree wholeheartedly), BUT: I give you the nounal (is that a word?) verb "impact". Originally in use especially in dentalese as an intransitive verb, it's now gotten a transitive usage, which was born of businessspeak as lore has it. I think I ought to have removed an "S" from that trio, there. Anyway, whenever I hear something like, "This will impact our sales," or the like, I still get the image of something all jammed together in an ugly fashion and requiring some sort of dire intervention like the Jaws of Life.

I'm getting over it. Sort of.

I just keep reminding myself that that sort of thing is evidence that our language is still alive and dynamic. As are "phat", "bling", and "televangelize". :wink:
"If you take music out of this world, you will have nothing but a ball of fire." - Balochi musician
User avatar
missy
Posts: 5833
Joined: Sun Sep 14, 2003 7:46 am
Please enter the next number in sequence: 1
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Contact:

Post by missy »

SteveK wrote:Once I had an ole banjo
It was strung with twine
The only song it ever would play
Was Trouble on my Mind.
I know that tune!!!!! :D
Missy

"When facts are few, experts are many"

http://www.strothers.com
User avatar
Flyingcursor
Posts: 6573
Joined: Tue Jul 30, 2002 6:00 pm
antispam: No
Please enter the next number in sequence: 8
Tell us something.: This is the first sentence. This is the second of the recommended sentences intended to thwart spam its. This is a third, bonus sentence!
Location: Portsmouth, VA1, "the States"

Post by Flyingcursor »

HDSarah wrote:It's ok, Nano. It's like saying ''hammer dulcimer'' instead of ''hammered dulcimer.'' I think we're safe. :)

As corruptions of the English language go, it isn't as bad as most. My pet peeve (ok, one of many! :P ) is the transformation of nouns into verbs. I was recently at a meeting where the leader kept saying ''We've been TASKED with . . .'' That one really grates on me for some reason.
I couldn't agree more.
I'll be sure to write this down while journaling. :lol: :lol:
I'm no longer trying a new posting paradigm
User avatar
Nanohedron
Moderatorer
Posts: 38226
Joined: Wed Dec 18, 2002 6:00 pm
antispam: No
Please enter the next number in sequence: 8
Tell us something.: Been a fluter, citternist, and uilleann piper; committed now to the way of the harp.

Oh, yeah: also a mod here, not a spammer. A matter of opinion, perhaps.
Location: Lefse country

Post by Nanohedron »

Just imagine if I couldn't string my cittern, reed my pipes, or stopper my flute.

I'd just sit here mousing.
"If you take music out of this world, you will have nothing but a ball of fire." - Balochi musician
User avatar
Darwin
Posts: 2719
Joined: Sat Jan 03, 2004 2:38 am
Please enter the next number in sequence: 1
Location: Flower Mound, TX
Contact:

Post by Darwin »

Nanohedron wrote:As long as we're really being OT, now...
Not that this particular topic had much hope of a long, fruitful existence...
All very well and good, dear Darwin (mind you, I agree wholeheartedly), BUT: I give you the nounal (is that a word?) verb "impact". Originally in use especially in dentalese as an intransitive verb, it's now gotten a transitive usage, which was born of businessspeak as lore has it. I think I ought to have removed an "S" from that trio, there. Anyway, whenever I hear something like, "This will impact our sales," or the like, I still get the image of something all jammed together in an ugly fashion and requiring some sort of dire intervention like the Jaws of Life.
Well, good old Webster's Ninth gives a date of 1601 for the transitive use of the verb, with one entry being:

    2 a: to have an impact on : to impinge on

On the other hand, the use of "impacted" to refer to teeth only goes back to 1831. (I've been neglecting my little Webster's, not realizing until now that it incuded earliest use dates.)
I'm getting over it. Sort of.

I just keep reminding myself that that sort of thing is evidence that our language is still alive and dynamic. As are "phat", "bling", and "televangelize". :wink:
And "hopefully"--but, hopefully, NEVER "irregardless".
Mike Wright

"When an idea is wanting, a word can always be found to take its place."
 --Goethe
User avatar
buddhu
Posts: 4092
Joined: Tue Sep 23, 2003 3:14 pm
Please enter the next number in sequence: 1
Location: In a ditch, just down the road from the pub
Contact:

Re: We've All Been OT!!!

Post by buddhu »

Nanohedron wrote:
My apologies to all for having offended.

:D
Nano, y're off topic with that. Take it to the Apologies forum, if you will.
And whether the blood be highland, lowland or no.
And whether the skin be black or white as the snow.
Of kith and of kin we are one, be it right, be it wrong.
As long as our hearts beat true to the lilt of a song.
User avatar
Flyingcursor
Posts: 6573
Joined: Tue Jul 30, 2002 6:00 pm
antispam: No
Please enter the next number in sequence: 8
Tell us something.: This is the first sentence. This is the second of the recommended sentences intended to thwart spam its. This is a third, bonus sentence!
Location: Portsmouth, VA1, "the States"

Post by Flyingcursor »

The observations on this thread could be impactful.
I'm no longer trying a new posting paradigm
User avatar
Tyler
Posts: 5816
Joined: Fri Apr 29, 2005 9:51 am
antispam: No
Please enter the next number in sequence: 8
Tell us something.: I've picked up the tinwhistle again after several years, and have recently purchased a Chieftain v5 from Kerry Whistles that I cannot wait to get (why can't we beam stuff yet, come on Captain Kirk, get me my Low D!)
Location: SLC, UT and sometimes Delhi, India
Contact:

Post by Tyler »

Flyingcursor wrote:The observations on this thread could be impactful.
That's irreliphant! Irregardless of the impactfulness or Clouseauesqueness of any such parcieved noshuns, it's cromulence and assal horizontology are strictly based in the principles of Dorkus Malorkus.
According to the book Electromicide For Dummies, this kind of prattle can only embiggen and introubulate the already dangerized knowitallism of you average human ego!
Down with the Knowledgeum!
“First lesson: money is not wealth; Second lesson: experiences are more valuable than possessions; Third lesson: by the time you arrive at your goal it’s never what you imagined it would be so learn to enjoy the process” - unknown
User avatar
Martin Milner
Posts: 4350
Joined: Tue Oct 16, 2001 6:00 pm
Please enter the next number in sequence: 1
Location: London UK

Post by Martin Milner »

Darwin wrote: Would you never chair a meeting, table a discussion, fish for your supper, host a party, sandpaper a board, knife a friend in the back, ax a suggestion, dog an enemy, cat around town, worm your way out of a tight spot, vacuum a rug, string popcorn, paper a room, tile a floor, bomb a bunker, ship a package, cart firewood, truck vegetables to market, water a plant, number someone among your friends, finger a squealer, hand someone a napkin, eye a cutie pie, head a group, arm your forces, elbow (or shoulder, or nose) someone aside, book a suspect, tower over a child, lord it over a subordinate, shoe a horse, flour a countertop, light a lamp, gun down a rival, tongue a trumpet, trumpet your name to a crowd, fiddle while Rome burns, needle an opponent, cement a driveway, tar a road, score an opera, frost a cake, sugar your coffee, milk a cow, telephone a friend, poison an enemy, radio for help, skin a deer, ski down a mountain, circle the block, hammer a nail, or nail a board?
I'm floored.
It don't mean a thing if it ain't got that schwing
User avatar
BrassBlower
Posts: 2224
Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2002 6:00 pm
antispam: No
Please enter the next number in sequence: 8
Location: Fly-Over Country

Post by BrassBlower »

Martin Milner wrote:
Darwin wrote: Would you never chair a meeting, table a discussion, fish for your supper, host a party, sandpaper a board, knife a friend in the back, ax a suggestion, dog an enemy, cat around town, worm your way out of a tight spot, vacuum a rug, string popcorn, paper a room, tile a floor, bomb a bunker, ship a package, cart firewood, truck vegetables to market, water a plant, number someone among your friends, finger a squealer, hand someone a napkin, eye a cutie pie, head a group, arm your forces, elbow (or shoulder, or nose) someone aside, book a suspect, tower over a child, lord it over a subordinate, shoe a horse, flour a countertop, light a lamp, gun down a rival, tongue a trumpet, trumpet your name to a crowd, fiddle while Rome burns, needle an opponent, cement a driveway, tar a road, score an opera, frost a cake, sugar your coffee, milk a cow, telephone a friend, poison an enemy, radio for help, skin a deer, ski down a mountain, circle the block, hammer a nail, or nail a board?
I'm floored.
OK, then go whistle a tune, or tune a whistle, or something. :D
https://www.facebook.com/4StringFantasy

I do not feel obliged to believe that that same God who has endowed us with sense, reason, and intellect has intended us to forgo their use.

-Galileo
User avatar
Nanohedron
Moderatorer
Posts: 38226
Joined: Wed Dec 18, 2002 6:00 pm
antispam: No
Please enter the next number in sequence: 8
Tell us something.: Been a fluter, citternist, and uilleann piper; committed now to the way of the harp.

Oh, yeah: also a mod here, not a spammer. A matter of opinion, perhaps.
Location: Lefse country

Post by Nanohedron »

Darwin wrote:Well, good old Webster's Ninth gives a date of 1601 for the transitive use of the verb, with one entry being:

2 a: to have an impact on : to impinge on

On the other hand, the use of "impacted" to refer to teeth only goes back to 1831. (I've been neglecting my little Webster's, not realizing until now that it incuded earliest use dates.)
My goodness. I honestly never heard the the transitive usage in my day until but some twentyish years ago, and it was decried by many's the anal-retentive Anglophone who bothered to hold it up as an example of The Decay of English. So much for scholarship.

This must have been one of those full-circle things.

*reminds self to Webster first, then blather*
"If you take music out of this world, you will have nothing but a ball of fire." - Balochi musician
Post Reply