Chiff and Fipple Forums
http://forums.chiffandfipple.com/

"He's your son!!" of APOD
http://forums.chiffandfipple.com/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=97469
Page 160 of 165

Author:  daveboling [ Mon Sep 21, 2020 7:48 am ]
Post subject:  Omega Sunrise

Image
Needs to sheet in the jib a bit...
dave boling

Author:  daveboling [ Wed Sep 23, 2020 8:33 am ]
Post subject:  Equinox in the Sky

Image
dave boling

Author:  daveboling [ Wed Sep 23, 2020 8:35 am ]
Post subject:  ISS Transits Mars

Image
dave boling

Author:  daveboling [ Thu Sep 24, 2020 7:21 am ]
Post subject:  Enceladus in Infrared

Image
dave boling

Author:  daveboling [ Fri Sep 25, 2020 9:27 am ]
Post subject:  Moon over Andromeda

Image
dave boling

Author:  david_h [ Sun Sep 27, 2020 12:10 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: "He's your son!!" of APOD

Can I take this opportunity to ask why astronomical photos so rarely indicate the angular field of view? Is it because the target audience is comprised mainly of people who already know 'how big' things are and those who don't care?

Author:  daveboling [ Wed Sep 30, 2020 7:40 am ]
Post subject:  Re: "He's your son!!" of APOD

For many of the images posted, the angular field of view is fractions of arc seconds. It doesn't mean much, and astronomers don't commonly use, angular field if it would read 1.3E-5 arc seconds for a galaxy cluster. A good number of the APOD descriptions will give angular field of view for larger objects, particularly those that are faint to the naked (can I say naked on this forum :shock: ) eye. Even Jupiter (and Saturn, both of which are currently prominent in the night sky), as large as it appears, ranges only from 29.8 to 50.1 arc seconds. So, at best, it would take ~72 Jupiter diameters to make one degree in the night sky. If I remember correctly (long odds here), a fist held at arms length is about 10 degrees (could be 15, don't clearly remember), so holding your fist out next to an object in the sky will allow you to "ballpark" the angular field of view.
Does this help or confuse (hint, I'm better at the latter than the former....)?

dave boling

Author:  daveboling [ Wed Sep 30, 2020 7:42 am ]
Post subject:  Moon Pairs and the Synodic Month

Image
dave boling

Author:  daveboling [ Wed Sep 30, 2020 7:44 am ]
Post subject:  Lightning over Colorado

Image
dave boling

Author:  daveboling [ Wed Sep 30, 2020 7:46 am ]
Post subject:  Filaments of the Cygnus Loop

Image
dave boling

Author:  daveboling [ Wed Sep 30, 2020 7:48 am ]
Post subject:  GW Orionis: A Star System with Tilted Rings

APOD video
dave boling

Author:  daveboling [ Wed Sep 30, 2020 7:50 am ]
Post subject:  Sonified: Eagle Nebula Pillars

Yet another APOD video
dave boling

Author:  david_h [ Fri Oct 02, 2020 10:45 am ]
Post subject:  Re: "He's your son!!" of APOD

daveboling wrote:
For many of the images posted, the angular field of view is fractions of arc seconds. It doesn't mean much, and astronomers don't commonly use, angular field if it would read 1.3E-5 arc seconds for a galaxy cluster. A good number of the APOD descriptions will give angular field of view for larger objects, particularly those that are faint to the naked (can I say naked on this forum :shock: ) eye. Even Jupiter (and Saturn, both of which are currently prominent in the night sky), as large as it appears, ranges only from 29.8 to 50.1 arc seconds. So, at best, it would take ~72 Jupiter diameters to make one degree in the night sky. If I remember correctly (long odds here), a fist held at arms length is about 10 degrees (could be 15, don't clearly remember), so holding your fist out next to an object in the sky will allow you to "ballpark" the angular field of view.
Does this help or confuse (hint, I'm better at the latter than the former....)?

dave boling

Thanks. It's a question I had been thinking of asking on this thread for years. I guess what I actually like to know is what the angular diameter of the things I am being shown. I asked about angular field of view as that seems analogous to a map scale - which by convention is always there to help us tell if we are looking at a contour map of a mountain or a molehill. The trouble with space is that it looks much the same however much we enlarge it. I posted prompted by the Andromeda galaxy image because there we were given a sense of scale. Without the moon it could have been like a picture from Hubble of a speck of light or less to the naked eye rather than something that is actually quite 'big in the sky' but not seen like that without a little image processing.

I guess unless one is an astronomer then for most of us it's just awesome eye candy.

Author:  daveboling [ Mon Oct 05, 2020 9:08 am ]
Post subject:  Solis Lacus: The Eye of Mars

Image
dave boling

Author:  daveboling [ Mon Oct 05, 2020 9:11 am ]
Post subject:  Biking to the Moon

Image
dave boling

Page 160 of 165 All times are UTC - 6 hours
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
https://www.phpbb.com/