winamp 5?

Socializing and general posts on wide-ranging topics. Remember, it's Poststructural!
Post Reply
User avatar
antstastegood
Posts: 519
Joined: Wed Apr 23, 2003 12:48 am
Please enter the next number in sequence: 1
Location: Seabiscuit's stomping ground.
Contact:

winamp 5?

Post by antstastegood »

Anyone used it? I just heard it came out, I wanted to hear some feedback before I upgrade. Reason I ask, is that winamp 3 was lousy, so I stuck with version 2.

ants
Unreasonable person,
ants
|___|)____________O___O___O___o__O___O_____|
TelegramSam
Posts: 2258
Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2001 6:00 pm
Please enter the next number in sequence: 1
Location: Nashville, TN
Contact:

Post by TelegramSam »

I swear by winamp 2. 3 did stink. I'd be interested in hearing about the new one too, though...
<i>The very powerful and the very stupid have one thing in common. They don't alter their views to fit the facts. They alter the facts to fit their views. Which can be uncomfortable if you happen to be one of the facts that needs altering.</i>
User avatar
glauber
Posts: 4967
Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2002 6:00 pm
Please enter the next number in sequence: 1
Location: I'm from Brazil, living in the Chicago area (USA)
Contact:

Post by glauber »

Yes, 5 is good. It's really like Winamp 2, not 3. They took 2 and added a few new features from 3. I recommend doing a custom setup and installing only the features you need, because there is some featuritis.
On the Internet, nobody knows you're a dog!
--Wellsprings--
Post Reply