Page 12 of 32

Re: Can't read it wrong

Posted: Mon Jul 10, 2017 3:07 pm
by rorybbellows
benhall.1 wrote:
john wrote:I'm not sure what a shaken back d is. Where can I hear one?
Do the shaken back and put the freshness back?
Why finish off with a question mark when there is no question being asked, irritating and ironic in equal measure.

RORY

Re: Can't read it wrong

Posted: Mon Jul 10, 2017 3:24 pm
by benhall.1
Just being silly, Rory. I'm sorry it irritated you.

Re: Can't read it wrong

Posted: Mon Jul 10, 2017 3:26 pm
by rorybbellows
benhall.1 wrote:Just being silly, Rory. I'm sorry it irritated you.
Ah, you're alright , I'll get over it ,in time .

Rory
ps I do the shake and vac myself.

Re: Can't read it wrong

Posted: Wed Jul 12, 2017 9:14 am
by s1m0n
kkrell wrote:Here is another example of the BBC's wonderful writing skill (italics mine):
http://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-india-40553992 wrote:Police in India say they have arrested a 60-year-old man who fatally shot his wife for serving his dinner late.

Ashok Kumar came home drunk on Saturday night and got into an argument with his wife, Rupesh Singh, a senior police officer in Ghaziabad city near the capital Delhi, told the BBC.

Sunaina, 55, was taken to hospital with a gunshot wound to her head, but by then she had died, reports said.

Mr Kumar has confessed to his crime and now regrets his actions, Mr Singh said.
Wait - is Singh the policeman, not the wife?

Mr. Kumar - don't expect dinner on time tomorrow, either.
Typically, male Sikhs have the surname Singh (="lion"), while female Sikhs take the surname Kaur (="princess").

Re: Can't read it wrong

Posted: Wed Jul 12, 2017 11:43 pm
by kkrell
s1m0n wrote:Typically, male Sikhs have the surname Singh (="lion"), while female Sikhs take the surname Kaur (="princess").
Thank you for this information, which no one in all my years attempted to teach me. Perhaps they shouldn't marry, being different species. Now we know what symbols to put on the rest room doors. I suppose as the Lion is sometimes referred to as the King of the Jungle, we have a King and a Princess, both royalty of a sort.

Re: Can't read it wrong

Posted: Wed Jul 12, 2017 11:55 pm
by benhall.1
kkrell wrote:
s1m0n wrote:Typically, male Sikhs have the surname Singh (="lion"), while female Sikhs take the surname Kaur (="princess").
Thank you for this information, which no one in all my years attempted to teach me. Perhaps they shouldn't marry, being different species. Now we know what symbols to put on the rest room doors. I suppose as the Lion is sometimes referred to as the King of the Jungle, we have a King and a Princess, both royalty of a sort.
When my friends Jasbir Singh and Geeta Kaur had their fourth child, the midwife said to Mrs Kaur, "Isn't it about time you two got married?" :)

Re: Can't read it wrong

Posted: Thu Jul 13, 2017 5:20 am
by Tunborough
A number of Sikhs, in this country certainly, use Singh/Kaur as a middle name, as with our current defence minister, Harjit Singh Sajjan.

Re: Can't read it wrong

Posted: Thu Jul 13, 2017 10:13 am
by chas
benhall.1 wrote: When my friends Jasbir Singh and Geeta Kaur had their fourth child, the midwife said to Mrs Kaur, "Isn't it about time you two got married?" :)
I would have thought that on the other side of the pond, they'd be more used to wives not taking their husbands' last names. It frustrates me that in the US, some things are just more difficult because my wife doesn't share my last name. She carries a copy of our marriage certificate lest something come up that requires her to prove we're married.

Re: Can't read it wrong

Posted: Thu Jul 13, 2017 4:02 pm
by benhall.1
chas wrote:
benhall.1 wrote: When my friends Jasbir Singh and Geeta Kaur had their fourth child, the midwife said to Mrs Kaur, "Isn't it about time you two got married?" :)
I would have thought that on the other side of the pond, they'd be more used to wives not taking their husbands' last names. It frustrates me that in the US, some things are just more difficult because my wife doesn't share my last name. She carries a copy of our marriage certificate lest something come up that requires her to prove we're married.
This was quite some while ago. 30 years? I probably should have mentioned that ...

Re: Can't read it wrong

Posted: Tue Aug 01, 2017 11:59 am
by Nanohedron
"They also urged residents to stay whereshelter in place."

http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/crime/gun ... ar-AApefBR

Re: Can't read it wrong

Posted: Sat Aug 19, 2017 10:14 am
by chas
I glanced at the label of my shower gel and saw:

Net wt. 13.5 fl. oz. (400 mL)

Fluid ounces and mL are units of volume, not weight. I'm sure that at a major multinational, several people have to sign off on it before it goes to the printer and is pasted onto bottles; I'm surprised none of them caught it.

Re: Can't read it wrong

Posted: Sat Aug 19, 2017 1:17 pm
by benhall.1
chas wrote:I glanced at the label of my shower gel and saw:

Net wt. 13.5 fl. oz. (400 mL)

Fluid ounces and mL are units of volume, not weight. I'm sure that at a major multinational, several people have to sign off on it before it goes to the printer and is pasted onto bottles; I'm surprised none of them caught it.
That's awful. That's exactly the sort of thing that has me puzzled for days, weeks, and sometimes months on end. Just for peace of mind, I'd have to throw that shower gel away.

Re: Can't read it wrong

Posted: Sat Aug 19, 2017 7:22 pm
by chas
benhall.1 wrote:
chas wrote:I glanced at the label of my shower gel and saw:

Net wt. 13.5 fl. oz. (400 mL)

Fluid ounces and mL are units of volume, not weight. I'm sure that at a major multinational, several people have to sign off on it before it goes to the printer and is pasted onto bottles; I'm surprised none of them caught it.
That's awful. That's exactly the sort of thing that has me puzzled for days, weeks, and sometimes months on end. Just for peace of mind, I'd have to throw that shower gel away.
It makes the skin of the metrologist in me crawl, but I'm able to keep my professional and personal lives separate.

Re: Can't read it wrong

Posted: Sun Aug 20, 2017 12:27 pm
by david_h
For me it's a case of 'can't read it right' even after having checked and found that mL (rather than ml) is normal on your side of the pond.

Why on earth would anyone adopt fonts that don't distinguish between l and 1 (or I and l)?

Re: Can't read it wrong

Posted: Fri Aug 25, 2017 8:56 am
by fatmac
You may well have said it in the preceding pages, but the ones that really bug me are when 'then' & 'than' are used in the wrong context. Often makes passages of text unreadable. :(