And this is precisely why I changed what I had been planning to write. I don't rightly know the answer. There's nothing very concrete I can put my finger on. It's an interesting thing, but, despite your very clear writing, there are still areas which are open to interpretation. This leads me to think, for instance, that it may be that I don't quite agree with your last point. Sometimes interviewers are right to leave something go, and manage to do so in such a way that the listener can hear clearly that the politician concerned has not answered the question. Then people can make their own judgment.walrii wrote:Oh, my. First, that was very nice of you. Thank you. Second, at the risk of sounding ungrateful or perhaps even a little sarcastic (such is truly not my intent), what did you almost/sorta/maybe disagree with in a partial/momentary/unsure fashion?benhall.1 wrote:I nearly said "just about everything" but then realised that that could provoke the response, "Oh? What didn't you agree with?"
Hmmm ... see, I'm not even sure that I agree with my own point there ...