I picked up a whistle because I was going to sessions as a singer and wanted to join in the tunes, too. Had some friends who were very, very patient as I learned my first few tunes, All-Ireland players who let me squeak away on Out on the Ocean and the Kesh again and again. Otherwise, I spent my time listening to them and to anyone else I could, whistle player or not. To be honest, I think this is far and away the most important thing you can do. There are some decent YouTube tutorials (and a lot of really terrible ones), some good books, and obviously a teacher will help your learning a great deal, but if you don't internalize the feel of the music, you'll always sound like a novice.
Eventually I got a flute, and spent much more time on that for many years. However, in the past year or so I've been spending a lot more time on the whistle. It's always in my pocket, so it's easy to play a few tunes here and there. As much as I love the flute, to be honest I just can't get enough of the whistle! I'm sure others here will know what I mean...
Nanohedron wrote:
TBH whistle terrified me for the longest time, because its very simplicity demands a special touch for the playing to sound really good.
I used to teach skiing, and we had a saying between us and the snowboarders, "skiing is easy to learn and hard to master, and snowboarding is the other way around."
Anyone who has been up on a snowboard knows that the first lesson or six that you have on a snowboard, you'll spend most of your time on your butt. The balance and everything is tough, and it takes a lot of practice to get good enough to make a few consecutive turns down a slope. That contrasted with skiing, where I could get a class of beginners doing basic turns down a bunny slope in the usual hour and a half's time. However, once you got the basics in snowboarding down, you were essentially good to go, and just needed to refine them. With skiing, you get increasingly technical if you want to improve, and it can take a lot longer to get to a top level.
It's not a perfect analogy, but I think there's a bit of similarity with flute and whistle. With the flute, it's tough to develop a good embouchure, but the reward is that once you have one, you have tons of control over your sound. You can alter dynamics and tone, use your breathing itself as a rhythmic device, and if your fingers are reasonably dextrous you'll sound great. Yes, you won't be Matt Molloy or Seamus Tansey just yet, but a decently competent flute player sounds, IMO, fairly good.
With a whistle, you can make a sound a heck of a lot easier than with a flute, and squawking out a tune within your first few minutes of picking it up is not out of the question. But man, making it sound like anything other than squawking is hard work! I've heard plenty of whistle players who can play loads of tunes at a good clip, have lots of ornaments at the ready, and still sound awful. You've got to know the music inside and out and have a feel for it to really make the whistle sing. True of any instrument, sure, but IMO the line between "incredible" and "unlistenable" with the whistle is a lot thinner.