It is currently Thu Oct 22, 2020 6:45 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 5 posts ] 
Author Message
 
PostPosted: Sat Oct 17, 2020 4:08 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 26, 2020 9:15 am
Posts: 73
Location: Tyler, Texas
My Feadog MKI is the whistle that I measure all other high D whistles against. For my taste it is exceptionally great sounding and easy to play.

Seeing that I have a fairly severe case of WhOAD, I acquired a Mk II to see what it sounded like. I then acquired a second one (the one with the large sticker) accidently. I thought I was buying another MkI but it turned out to be another Mk II (no stripped sticker at the bottom).

The MK II’s are nice whistles but just not as nice (in my opinion) as the MKI’s. They are louder than the MK I’s and have a more gravely sound in the lower octave and a much more shrill sound in the higher octave. I’ve never felt the need to put putty in either of the MK II’s that I have because their notes have always sounded stable and I haven't had them squeak or squelch. But I have never been satisfied with their sound since they didn’t have the nice velvety mellow sound the MkI does.
I decided to try doing the reversible tweak on them using the small piece of plastic attaching it directly under the wind ramp. I attached it with a tiny piece of putty so this is reversible. I first did it on the MkII with the big sticker and immediately liked the results. To me it sounded just like the MkI. After playing it a few days and comparing it to the MKI, I would say it sounds about 95 percent like the MkI. There are some very subtle differences when you really listen closely. But I think blindfolded I wouldn’t be able to tell which one I was playing, that’s how close they sound to one another now.

I then tried it on my other MkII with the small sticker. The results were good but not great. It lowered the volume of the notes and made them more mellow and velvety but it just wasn’t as close as the first MkII I had done. I wasn’t satisfied so I took the piece of plastic out and put a bevel on the leading edge and when attaching it back in the whistle, I placed the bevel facing downward. Much better! Now it sounds almost as good as the MkI. I would say about 90-95% as good. When playing the three back to back to back, I have to look at them to know for sure which one it is I’m playing.

If anyone is interested I will share more detailed information about what I did (placement, shape, size, and etc.)

One curious thing I have found is that it seems of the 4 whistles I have (Mark 1, 2’s and a 2.5) the two MkII’s are different. I’ve included a picture for you to see what I mean. The MkI and MkII with the big sticker have holes that are alike. The MKII with the small sticker and Mk2.5 have the same hole size and placement to each other but are different from the MkI and MkII with the big sticker. You cannot see it in the picture but the MkII (small sticker) and Mk 2.5 are just a tad shorter in length than the other two whistles. I’m attributing those differences to why I had to bevel the plastic in the small sticker MkII and not in the big sticker Mk II to get them to sound alike.

(l to r : MkI, MkII, MkII, Mk2.5)
Image


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 
PostPosted: Sun Oct 18, 2020 5:27 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jul 10, 2006 7:25 am
Posts: 4718
Location: WV to the OC
That's interesting. Looks like they changed head design but continued to use the MK1 body for a time.

I've posted this before, my oldest MK1 (left) and a second MK1 I bought a few years later (centre).

The older one is a darker green, and I feel it plays better. I don't know anything about the change in colour. When were the different colours used? Was there was any change in the mould?

Image

BTW I don't know when I got the one on the right, or what it might be called. It looks different from all of yours. It isn't very good.

_________________
Richard Cook
1978 Quinn uilleann pipes
1945 Starck Highland pipes
Goldie Low D whistle


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 
PostPosted: Sun Oct 18, 2020 6:23 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 10, 2015 2:59 am
Posts: 151
Location: Coventry, England
The one on the right of your three is the current Feadog whistle.

_________________
Andrew Wigglesworth
http://www.greenmanrising.co.uk


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 19, 2020 8:37 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 26, 2020 9:15 am
Posts: 73
Location: Tyler, Texas
pancelticpiper wrote:
That's interesting. Looks like they changed head design but continued to use the MK1 body for a time.

BTW I don't know when I got the one on the right, or what it might be called. It looks different from all of yours. It isn't very good.


That was my supposition too, I figured they had some MkI bodies left over and used them up making some of the early MkII's.

The far right one in your picture looks like the head of my Feadog Pro. Like ecadre said, it is current day production MkIII (or a MkIV if you call the Mk2.5 a MkIII)


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 19, 2020 9:13 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 07, 2010 11:31 am
Posts: 5529
Location: the Back of Beyond
As far as I know it was Cillian O'Briain who suggested some changes to help with better intonation to the Feadóg tubes once he started 'improving' them. Feadóg teo adopted those changes.

I don't think the Feadóg pro head is in any way different from the standard. Some pro tubes may be thicker (that's what they tell us anyway) although I haven't really seen any evidence of this.

_________________
My brain hurts

Image


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 5 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 6 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 20 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
[ Time : 0.089s | 11 Queries | GZIP : On ]
(dh)