On Learning: Part One

The Ultimate On-Line Whistle Community. If you find one more ultimater, let us know.
Polara Pat
Posts: 284
Joined: Tue Nov 14, 2017 9:01 pm
antispam: No
Please enter the next number in sequence: 8
Tell us something.: In an effort to ease from lurker to forum member; I'm hoping that this elite gang of whistlers will help this very green player to advance to the next stage. My current stage is slightly below novice and is only permitted in the garage like the dog I am. Oh yah, not a robot.

Re: On Learning: Part One

Post by Polara Pat »

AngelicBeaver wrote: I think that the improvements are very rapid, initially, as you learn how to cover holes and move your fingers, but the curve definitely begins to level off once you get beyond the basics. I'd say I'm hundred times better than I was on day one, four times as good as I was at a month, and two to three times as good as I was at a year. I'm better than I was in 2014, but not miles better. The farther you advance, the harder you have to work for far less noticeable gains.

If you're doing it right, you rough out your skill set in the first year or so, and then it comes down to details and speed and execution. Getting your rhythm a bit better. Getting your ornamentation a little more precise. Gaining speed without sacrificing accuracy. Learning how to be intentional about your breathing and using it skillfully. Figuring out how to go beyond simple regurgitation and recitation of tunes but imbuing them with new life in your own interpretation. It's what separates the pros from the enthusiasts.

You sprint to maybe 50% of your potential, then stroll to 65%, then shuffle to 75%, then crawl to 80%, then drag yourself to 85%, then spend the rest of your life inching toward 90%.

If you are interested in pestering a real whistle player, there are several excellent teachers who offer Skype lessons. A friend of mine in San Antonio is learning flute from Kevin Crawford of Lunasa fame via Skype, so geography needn't be a hard barrier (although money might be).

P.S. - As an amateur whistle player myself, I reserve the right to be completely wrong about all of the above. These are just my personal feelings and observations on the topic. There are others on this forum with far more experience and skill than I have accumulated over the last few years.
I'm liking everything that you have to say here. Well, maybe not liking it so much since it means that I need to keep pushing the boulder uphill for a long time but I get it. I'm pretty self motivated and I do plan on taking a few classes from OAIM in the NY. I think it also comes down to your playing goals. Right now I am shooting for tolerable; in a year that might be upped to acceptable but until a month ago I didn't even know what a session was, so it's not even on my radar. Keeping my learning goals realistic and only focusing on the tunes that I know and like for now suits me fine. Hey, if I sing the song in my head while I play is it still a tune and not a song. That's my dumb question of the day.
Dan A.
Posts: 453
Joined: Thu Nov 30, 2017 8:19 pm
antispam: No
Please enter the next number in sequence: 8
Tell us something.: I can only hope that my proficiency with the whistle is steadily improving. A few of my whistles get a workout on an almost daily basis. And I'm almost certainly afflicted with WhOAD.
Location: Detroit Metro

Re: On Learning: Part One

Post by Dan A. »

Polara Pat wrote:Hey, if I sing the song in my head while I play is it still a tune and not a song. That's my dumb question of the day.
I do that on occasion, and it has no discernible impact on my whistling. As one would not be able to hear the singing, I would say it remains a tune.

As this thread is titled, in part, "On Learning," there is one thing I've learned. My whistle plays much, much better when it's warm. Even just pulling it back and forth between my elbow and side for 15 to 30 seconds makes a world of difference when playing high D and high E.
Polara Pat
Posts: 284
Joined: Tue Nov 14, 2017 9:01 pm
antispam: No
Please enter the next number in sequence: 8
Tell us something.: In an effort to ease from lurker to forum member; I'm hoping that this elite gang of whistlers will help this very green player to advance to the next stage. My current stage is slightly below novice and is only permitted in the garage like the dog I am. Oh yah, not a robot.

Re: On Learning: Part One

Post by Polara Pat »

Dan A. wrote:
Polara Pat wrote:Hey, if I sing the song in my head while I play is it still a tune and not a song. That's my dumb question of the day.
I do that on occasion, and it has no discernible impact on my whistling. As one would not be able to hear the singing, I would say it remains a tune.

As this thread is titled, in part, "On Learning," there is one thing I've learned. My whistle plays much, much better when it's warm. Even just pulling it back and forth between my elbow and side for 15 to 30 seconds makes a world of difference when playing high D and high E.

I kind of had you in mind when I started this thread Dan, since it seems like we may be at a similar level of playing. Maybe even similar age too but that's just a guess. As far as the song vs. tune question...it was meant to be a bit tongue in cheek. Just a bit.
Dan A.
Posts: 453
Joined: Thu Nov 30, 2017 8:19 pm
antispam: No
Please enter the next number in sequence: 8
Tell us something.: I can only hope that my proficiency with the whistle is steadily improving. A few of my whistles get a workout on an almost daily basis. And I'm almost certainly afflicted with WhOAD.
Location: Detroit Metro

Re: On Learning: Part One

Post by Dan A. »

Polara Pat wrote:I kind of had you in mind when I started this thread Dan, since it seems like we may be at a similar level of playing. Maybe even similar age too but that's just a guess.
I suspect that your playing might be a bit more advanced than mine. If you can convincingly play more than two tunes (though I've almost added a third tune to my repertoire), suspicion confirmed. As for age? I'm 39.
westonm
Posts: 27
Joined: Wed Dec 13, 2017 2:40 pm
antispam: No
Please enter the next number in sequence: 8
Tell us something.: Hey! I'm interested in tin whistles and traditional irish and celtic music. It's an exciting opportunity to explore the scotch-irish roots of my family as well as play some old Civil War era tunes.

Re: On Learning: Part One

Post by westonm »

I talked to a guy online last week who tried to argue that the tin whistle wasn't even a real instrument at all, but merely a toy

I suspect he was trolling me, for he had several other choice words to say about Irish culture in general

From my perspective if it produces a pleasing sound it is music. And with my limited understanding, it seems to me that there are plenty of other instruments with similar range and utility that no one would argue are "not instruments" or, as Dave mentioned "are easy to learn" in absolute terms. Though I suspect it may be easier to learn compared to say, a guitar or piano

At least I'm hoping so.
User avatar
Nanohedron
Moderatorer
Posts: 38224
Joined: Wed Dec 18, 2002 6:00 pm
antispam: No
Please enter the next number in sequence: 8
Tell us something.: Been a fluter, citternist, and uilleann piper; committed now to the way of the harp.

Oh, yeah: also a mod here, not a spammer. A matter of opinion, perhaps.
Location: Lefse country

Re: On Learning: Part One

Post by Nanohedron »

westonm wrote:I talked to a guy online last week who tried to argue that the tin whistle wasn't even a real instrument at all, but merely a toy
Let him witness the likes of Mary Bergin and say that. I think he was trolling you. If he really believes what he says, no doubt it has to do with the whistle's simplicity, but that's no legitimate argument.
"If you take music out of this world, you will have nothing but a ball of fire." - Balochi musician
User avatar
Mr.Gumby
Posts: 6611
Joined: Mon Jun 07, 2010 11:31 am
antispam: No
Please enter the next number in sequence: 8
Location: the Back of Beyond

Re: On Learning: Part One

Post by Mr.Gumby »

Though I suspect it may be easier to learn compared to say, a guitar or piano
It probably is, but when learning a simple instrument or a relatively simple music like Irish music (or any other folk/traditional idiom) the devil is really in the detail, the small things count for a lot. Anyone suggesting a month goes a long way to mastery of the instrument in my opinion doesn't understand the nature of mastery: having full control of the fine detail and nuances. Simple tunes played adequately, they're in easy-ish reach though. And from there you keep on developing, or at last you would hope so.
My brain hurts

Image
User avatar
s1m0n
Posts: 10069
Joined: Wed Oct 06, 2004 12:17 am
antispam: No
Please enter the next number in sequence: 10
Location: The Inside Passage

Re: On Learning: Part One

Post by s1m0n »

Mr.Gumby wrote:Anyone suggesting a month goes a long way to mastery of the instrument in my opinion doesn't understand the nature of mastery
Note that I didn't say you could attain mastery in two months, merely that you could go a long way towards it. Which is true, in comparison to nearly every other instrument in the world.

You must know at least one accomplished musician who has decided to take up the whistle. They'll make remarkable progress. The nuances might take years, but the basics are easy.
And now there was no doubt that the trees were really moving - moving in and out through one another as if in a complicated country dance. ('And I suppose,' thought Lucy, 'when trees dance, it must be a very, very country dance indeed.')

C.S. Lewis
User avatar
Mr.Gumby
Posts: 6611
Joined: Mon Jun 07, 2010 11:31 am
antispam: No
Please enter the next number in sequence: 8
Location: the Back of Beyond

Re: On Learning: Part One

Post by Mr.Gumby »

I think we have different understandings of the nature of 'mastery'. But nver mind that, no need to flesh that out here (I know, I started it).
My brain hurts

Image
User avatar
Peter Duggan
Posts: 3223
Joined: Tue Aug 30, 2011 5:39 pm
antispam: No
Please enter the next number in sequence: 8
Tell us something.: I'm not registering, I'm trying to edit my profile! The field “Tell us something.” is too short, a minimum of 100 characters is required.
Location: Kinlochleven
Contact:

Re: On Learning: Part One

Post by Peter Duggan »

westonm wrote:Though I suspect it may be easier to learn compared to say, a guitar or piano
Speaking as someone who plays about a dozen instruments to a reasonable standard and none really well any more (the nearest would have been the recorder, which I studied abroad thirty years ago but no longer play anything like that seriously), I'd say there are ultimately no 'easy' instruments if you want to get good. While some are initially more approachable and let you get going quicker, you're quite simply going to need both top-class talent and top-class dedication to be top-class at anything. And, for those that don't appear to make quite the same eye- and ear-popping demands as others, there's still plenty going on to distinguish the good from the great and the great from the best. From working year after year to get my school music pupils through their SQA (Scottish Qualifications Authority) performing exams, I'm aware that the notionally equivalent minimum standards for instruments across the board aren't necessarily so at all. But that doesn't make anyone having a harder time on instrument X or Y at that level any more likely to make world-class on instrument Z even if Z may temporarily be* the 'softer' option.

*In which context 'be' could mean 'appear to be' or even genuinely 'be' for a while, at that level, for that purpose.
And we in dreams behold the Hebrides.

Master of nine?
User avatar
pancelticpiper
Posts: 5306
Joined: Mon Jul 10, 2006 7:25 am
antispam: No
Please enter the next number in sequence: 8
Tell us something.: Playing Scottish and Irish music in California for 45 years.
These days many discussions are migrating to Facebook but I prefer the online chat forum format.
Location: WV to the OC

Re: On Learning: Part One

Post by pancelticpiper »

Polara Pat wrote:If I hear one more person tell me that playing the whistle is the easiest instrument to learn I may just have to turn my whistle into a lethal weapon.
Or as we used to say back home "stick it where the sun don't shine"!
Richard Cook
c1980 Quinn uilleann pipes
1945 Starck Highland pipes
Goldie Low D whistle
User avatar
pancelticpiper
Posts: 5306
Joined: Mon Jul 10, 2006 7:25 am
antispam: No
Please enter the next number in sequence: 8
Tell us something.: Playing Scottish and Irish music in California for 45 years.
These days many discussions are migrating to Facebook but I prefer the online chat forum format.
Location: WV to the OC

Re: On Learning: Part One

Post by pancelticpiper »

s1m0n wrote:Learning technique and learning the music are two different skills.
My first instrument was the GHB and I started out (like so many others) with scales and simple exercises first, then simple slow tunes, then gradually on to faster tunes. Things like reels and jigs were held back for quite a while.

So when I got my first ITM instrument- a wood flute- it surprised me to find that the few ITM players around advocated jumping in with reels and jigs from the get-go.

Then later when I studied Baroque flute at University it was the diametric opposite, practising excercises only, hundreds of them, book after book full the them, for what seemed like forever, until my teacher dropped a Bach piece on the stand. And you know what? I could play it, because there wasn't anything in there that I hadn't already done many times.

So there are many approaches but they all produce good players.

I will say that when I practice jigs or reels slowed down a bit with a metronome I find that my fingering gets more precise and that I memorise the tunes more quickly. It also ingrains, with me anyhow, keeping the rhythm going forward no matter what.
Richard Cook
c1980 Quinn uilleann pipes
1945 Starck Highland pipes
Goldie Low D whistle
Polara Pat
Posts: 284
Joined: Tue Nov 14, 2017 9:01 pm
antispam: No
Please enter the next number in sequence: 8
Tell us something.: In an effort to ease from lurker to forum member; I'm hoping that this elite gang of whistlers will help this very green player to advance to the next stage. My current stage is slightly below novice and is only permitted in the garage like the dog I am. Oh yah, not a robot.

Re: On Learning: Part One

Post by Polara Pat »

pancelticpiper wrote:
s1m0n wrote:Learning technique and learning the music are two different skills.
My first instrument was the GHB and I started out (like so many others) with scales and simple exercises first, then simple slow tunes, then gradually on to faster tunes. Things like reels and jigs were held back for quite a while.

So when I got my first ITM instrument- a wood flute- it surprised me to find that the few ITM players around advocated jumping in with reels and jigs from the get-go.

Then later when I studied Baroque flute at University it was the diametric opposite, practising excercises only, hundreds of them, book after book full the them, for what seemed like forever, until my teacher dropped a Bach piece on the stand. And you know what? I could play it, because there wasn't anything in there that I hadn't already done many times.

So there are many approaches but they all produce good players.

I will say that when I practice jigs or reels slowed down a bit with a metronome I find that my fingering gets more precise and that I memorise the tunes more quickly. It also ingrains, with me anyhow, keeping the rhythm going forward no matter what.
Maybe it's just dyslexia but I thought for sure that you said that your first instrument was GBH!! yikes. Anyways, it's always good to get input from the longtime professionals and although a lot of the info might fly over my head, I like to think that I absorb at least a little. There was a point, not too long ago that I wasn't sure if I would be capable of memorizing songs. Thankfully I overcame that that fear and now have a few favorites in the bag. I still have a long way to go but look forward to the journey.
User avatar
pancelticpiper
Posts: 5306
Joined: Mon Jul 10, 2006 7:25 am
antispam: No
Please enter the next number in sequence: 8
Tell us something.: Playing Scottish and Irish music in California for 45 years.
These days many discussions are migrating to Facebook but I prefer the online chat forum format.
Location: WV to the OC

Re: On Learning: Part One

Post by pancelticpiper »

sorry Great Highland Bagpipe, so called because there are other sizes of Highland bagpipe, and Lowland bagpipes too.

GBH... Great Big Horn? German Bock Hummelchen?
Richard Cook
c1980 Quinn uilleann pipes
1945 Starck Highland pipes
Goldie Low D whistle
User avatar
pancelticpiper
Posts: 5306
Joined: Mon Jul 10, 2006 7:25 am
antispam: No
Please enter the next number in sequence: 8
Tell us something.: Playing Scottish and Irish music in California for 45 years.
These days many discussions are migrating to Facebook but I prefer the online chat forum format.
Location: WV to the OC

Re: On Learning: Part One

Post by pancelticpiper »

Mr.Gumby wrote:I think we have different understandings of the nature of 'mastery'.
Yes it is puzzling when somebody talks about "mastering" a tune. Whatever does that mean?

I know I've never mastered one, and never will.

On the contrary the tunes always have a way of demonstrating their mastery over me.
Richard Cook
c1980 Quinn uilleann pipes
1945 Starck Highland pipes
Goldie Low D whistle
Post Reply